LONG_KEELER
Well-Known Member
9pm update 34nm.
He must run out of wind soon though?
A tacking duel after 19,000 miles ?
9pm update 34nm.
He must run out of wind soon though?
If you were sarcastic, you'd have noticed that the interest of most of the forumers is linked to the chance of AT bagging it, not to the race itself.
Alex is taking The Boss well east of the Rhumb line, so although he is now going significantly faster, he is not gaining miles at the same rate
Neal McDonald (of fabulous Volvo fame), on Vendee TV, reckoned that HB could still be the faster design downwind. But Armel better in light airs or beating. That may explain why Armel appears to be taking a slightly more westerly heading through these light airs, with a beat on the other side and closer to land.
Contrary to some other posts, I dont believe that Alex following Armel is a good strategy. In the two high pressure zones, it is mostly first in first out. If Alex takes the safe, 'follow Amel' option, then he is (almost) guaranteed only 2nd place. But taking a gamble on a different option will still see him in 2nd anyway if it doesnt pay off, and with a chance of the win if it does.
Alex seems to be shaping up to head through this high pressure, low wind area, more to the East than Armel, and riding his current wind a little further than Armel managed.
And we also know they are also choosing their route through based on the favorable currents from satellite data.
Methinks this is where Alex will be looking very very closely at the data, and for alternate options.
It is interesting to view the latest 1700GMT plot from https://gis.ee/vg/ which shows on the forward time projections changes to the tracks of the contenders including deffinate tacks. How are they making these assumptions? Are they just guessing?
It's not a glitch - it's an addition to the tracker which has been put together by a clever guy on Sailing AnarchyYeah - I picked up on that too - I put it down to a glitch.