WFA
Well-Known Member
Yes, sorry for the hasty response!Well I thought I just had at #35 - but tell me more.
Yes, sorry for the hasty response!Well I thought I just had at #35 - but tell me more.

Yes, sorry for the hasty response!
I cannot find the reference now but in the past this was explained to me as- you are allowed to anchor in a shellfish area but if any of the shellfish are damaged by a vessel grounding on them then damages are payable.As an area classified as B Quality water any oysters lifted from there would have to be relaid elsewhere or go to a depuration plant. They cannot be put on the market & sold as is.
I don't eat oysters but in general I would favour something that boosts the local economy. I have only anchored in Kirby Creek a couple of times over the years, and I think it would be a pity if a quiet anchorage such as this were to become unavailable and don't see why an approved anchoring area couldn't be set out. Also, it can be one of the few comfortable places for a small boat in bad weather.Posting as one who is based in the Backwaters and anchored extensively for many years, oyster bed restrictions have never caused me any problems.
Kirby Creek and the Wade do not provide easy access to landing sites, which in themselves are a long way from vehicular communications so rarely used for anchoring.
There are plenty of alternative site to anchor and always a ‘free buoy’ or two in the Walton Channel so hopefully we can all continue to live in harmony and should I wish it, visit the Harbour Lights for some oysters.
If this latest oyster venture proves successful, hopefully other local restaurants will have oysters on their menu, to the benefit of both the community and the local economy.
Even when the Kirby Oyster Bed was active it, didn’t cover the whole creek so there was still a deep water anchorage near Skipper Island, or at the Hamford Water end tucked in behind Horsey Island. Landermere Creek can also offer good protection in all wind directions.I don't eat oysters but in general I would favour something that boosts the local economy. I have only anchored in Kirby Creek a couple of times over the years, and I think it would be a pity if a quiet anchorage such as this were to become unavailable and don't see why an approved anchoring area couldn't be set out. Also, it can be one of the few comfortable places for a small boat in bad weather.
I think you are missing the point about approved fisheries granting the operator to work the fishery on a commercial basis within the parameters of the licence or order and without the hindrance of vessels anchoring within boundaries of the fishery. If a Several Order exists the details will be available in the public domain.I cannot find the reference now but in the past this was explained to me as- you are allowed to anchor in a shellfish area but if any of the shellfish are damaged by a vessel grounding on them then damages are payable.
This may be complicated now as some shellfish area are not just laying on the seabed but raised on platforms in bags which could easily trap an anchor.
Ooo yes.I'm mystified why anyone would want an oyster after tasting one for the first time . I can understand why some advise to swallow them whole.
Does anyone here like them ?
Kirby Creek and the Wade do not provide easy access to landing sites, which in themselves are a long way from vehicular communications so rarely used for anchoring.
If you want a safe, secluded, isolated anchorage, try Landermere - you won’t dry out or around Skippers Island.That remoteness is exactly the attraction though.
If you're not ready to dry out and don't want to go ashore Kirby creek in my view is the best anchorage by far in the whole of the backwaters. It's sheltered from all directions and doesn't suffer the wind over tide chop Hamford water often can.
Since the Several Order has expired there's often been boats anchored there enjoying the peace and quiet and long may that continue.
But do they make you randy ?Ooo yes.
Delicious with glass or two of white wine I'll have a dozen anytime in France and especially when on the Atlantic coast around the Bassin d'Arcachon. But I won't eat any shellfish harvested from UK waters because of the tendency of our water utilities to add shareholder value by sweetening our coasts and rivers with millions of litres of raw sewage whenever they can get away with it.
The oysters that I had on the French West coast all went through the cleaning tanks. The same with the UK ones apart from maybe parts of Scotland.Ooo yes.
Delicious with glass or two of white wine I'll have a dozen anytime in France and especially when on the Atlantic coast around the Bassin d'Arcachon. But I won't eat any shellfish harvested from UK waters because of the tendency of our water utilities to add shareholder value by sweetening our coasts and rivers with millions of litres of raw sewage whenever they can get away with it.
But do they make you randy ?
Asking for a friend .
Pacific (gigas) oysters are a highly invasive non-native species and have caused problems with infestation in many places around our coastline, including Brightlingsea: https://www.researchgate.net/figure...ingsea-Essex-Syvret-et-al-2008_fig2_266287248. I’m strongly of the view that cultivation of them should be banned.There's an oyster farm at Porlock Bay. Unfortunately they have chosen to breed Pacific oysters rather than natives.