Two or 3 blade prop for less prop-walk

oldharry

Well-known member
Joined
30 May 2001
Messages
9,858
Location
North from the Nab about 10 miles
Visit site
I went from 2 to 3 blade on my 24 footer. A signifiucant improvement in power and handling boith forward and astern. The 2 blader created serious prop walk, which almost cmpletely disappeared with the 3 blades. No, I didnt expect it either!
 

adwuk

Active member
Joined
10 Jun 2015
Messages
788
Location
Tarbert
Visit site
We had a 2 bladed fixed and switched to a 3 bladed featherstream. Prop walk is reduced, so much so that we can now steer back in a straight line and even get a slight reverse turn to starboard with full starboard rudder - a feat that was previously impossible.
 

Bobc

Well-known member
Joined
20 Jan 2011
Messages
10,001
Visit site
We had a 2 bladed fixed and switched to a 3 bladed featherstream. Prop walk is reduced, so much so that we can now steer back in a straight line and even get a slight reverse turn to starboard with full starboard rudder - a feat that was previously impossible.
That has been my experience too, which is why I recommended it to the OP.
 

Laminar Flow

Well-known member
Joined
14 Jan 2020
Messages
1,852
Location
West Coast
Visit site
A two bladed prop versus a 3 blade will have a larger diametre to maintain blade area. This will reduce clearances and in this particular case, to the hull, thus reducing flow over the top of the prop, compared to the bottom. It is the pressure differential that causes the propwalk. Conversely, switching to a 3 blade reduces propwalk by increasing clearance.
The most ideal prop would have but a single blde, but for obvious reasons the ride would be a bit bumpy. Next is a 2 blade but sufficient diametre can be difficult to achieve, when space restrictions, tip velocity issues that lead to cavitation, maintaining blade area to keep blade loading at a reasonable level, tend to set practical limits. A two bladed prop on a sailing boat is generally chosen to limit impact on sailing performance at the expense of that under power.
 
Top