Thames value for money

miket

Well-Known Member
Joined
21 Jun 2001
Messages
2,008
Location
N Hampshire
Visit site
Just returned from 4 days cruising from Sonning to Moulsford return.
After a busy year moving house with little time to use our boat, we finally managed a few days on the river. Not the greatest weather but managed half decent weather, At least remaining fairly dry.
From Sonning through Reading was dismal! So many hulks occupying riverside spots. What must visitors to the river think?! I know EA is suffering from under funding but come on. In a few years time all these hulks are going to be sitting on the bottom as their hulls rot through and the occupants have moved on, having abandoned their temporary cheap homes. Who pays then to clear up the mess, if anyone bothers. Many other places on the river seem to be suffering the same. Something needs to be done.
Tesco's (Reading) mooring was wall to wall canal boats, many of which were there last time we passed at least a month ago.
We find it quite depressing that the river we have used and loved for so many years has become a cheap home for new age travellers.
We came across one of the few remaining EA Inspectors launches and gave them a cheery wave. In response we got a miserable look (no wave in response) and a feeling that they were more interested in our speed/ wash. I later put on the chartplotter and was pleased to see that we were doing 4.7 knots. Easily close enough to the limit, especially in the absence of anything else moving.
On the plus side we had excellent meals at both the Miller of Mansfield (Goring) and Rossini at the Leatherne Botel.

For around £800 pa I am not sure that we are getting value for money.
If it were not for the social value of our continued membership of Upper Thames Motor Yacht Club, I really think we would call it a day.

Can someone tell me (with justification) that I am just being a grumpy old man?!
 
Not grumpy, just telling it like it is.

If our boat was still on the Thames it would be up for sale now.

I have nothing against liveaboards - I was one for 20 years - but the boat was always kept immaculate and there was never anything to give away the fact I lived on it. It looked just like any other motor cruiser in the marina.

If you want to live on it that's fine by me but why oh why does it have to look like a sh*t heap. There's no excuse. Even old boats can be kept looking neat and tidy. Not burying them under piles of cr*p and taking the p*ss with moorings would be a start.

Me, Grumpy? No. Just angry at how the river I've loved for 40+ years is going down the pan big time.
 
Sorry but cannot agree with many of those comments.My recent 2015 trip proved to just as enjoyable as any of our previous adventures on the Thames.The Thames is now also being enjoyed by a far wider proportion of the population at large and not just a select few with the the money or the good fortune to live in the Thames area.
Some still appear to think that the river should be preserved as some sort of sanitized private theme park and should be immune to the commercial pressures of the outside world.
As for the £800 quid that would buy you a half decent Smart TV, fancy Iphone but not a decent camera.. :)
 
Sorry but cannot agree with many of those comments.My recent 2015 trip proved to just as enjoyable as any of our previous adventures on the Thames.The Thames is now also being enjoyed by a far wider proportion of the population at large and not just a select few with the the money or the good fortune to live in the Thames area.
Some still appear to think that the river should be preserved as some sort of sanitized private theme park and should be immune to the commercial pressures of the outside world.
As for the £800 quid that would buy you a half decent Smart TV, fancy Iphone but not a decent camera.. :)

Oldgit. If you used your boat on the Thames for as long as I had, you would agree with all of the above. But lots of it is stunning and well kept, which is why I stay.
 
Last edited:
One thing that I did notice about the worst looking liveaboards, is that many of them had out of date CaRT licences and were displaying(often expired)visitors tickets. It's a shame that the EA don't have the power to nip this problem in the bud and be a bit more selective about who and what it allows on it's river.
 
Boating will never be value for money..... it is 100% self indulgent squandering of money. It is an excessive luxury that very few can afford.

If the licence fee had to cover all the costs of the staffing and maintenance of the navigation, it would be significantly more than £800 a year........ it is amazing that many millions of £ of the general public's taxes go a long way to subsidise our hobby.

My local gliding club don't get their landing strip mown by DEFRA..... My daughters Pony Club don't get their 'waste' removed for a modest fee....


#justsayin
 
I take pride in my house, my boat, my car and my appearance. Standards old chap.:p. I remember my Grandmother telling me that you can tell a lot about a person by their shoes. It's true. Although that was before Crocs were invented:D
 
Last edited:
What is it costing to completely disrupt South West London on a Friday night... A316 closed, trains all messed up, forget the buses because all the roads will be gridlocked due to the A316 closure, all for someone's hobby (watching rugby).

And then again on Saturday!
 
I'm dreading it. Landlocked unless I can get to the boat before the road closures(boat in Teddington, me by the rugby ground). On the subject of disruption due to other people's hobbies.....cycling?
 
I'm dreading it. Landlocked unless I can get to the boat before the road closures(boat in Teddington, me by the rugby ground).
Roads close at 4pm today.
Then again for every match at Twickers from 3 hours before kick-off until 2 hours after the final whistle. That's near enough 7 hours each match.
 
Top