laffinskip
Well-Known Member
Teak
first class finish-excellent job.I would love to see the whole boat.
first class finish-excellent job.I would love to see the whole boat.
Actually the Sikkens product came second to Coelan.
![]()
Looks great on my boat after four years since application.
![]()
+100 for Coelan.Hugely expensive but we have areas that havn't been recoated for 6 years and still look good.So in the long run cheaper....no more 10 coats of Epifanes every year!!PS Based in Eastern Med(Montenegro)
first class finish-excellent job.I would love to see the whole boat.![]()
Not only that. When it does start to go and needs removing - and sooner or later, it will - there will be patches that will stick like the proverbial to a blanket. The resulting work to remove it will be among the worst of your life.No. Look at the comparative figures. Would have to last 20-30 times as long as other finishes to be cheaper in the long run (ignoring cost of labour if you are paying somebody to do it).Originally Posted by Mad Pad
+100 for Coelan.Hugely expensive but we have areas that havn't been recoated for 6 years and still look good.So in the long run cheaper....no more 10 coats of Epifanes every year!!PS Based in Eastern Med(Montenegro)
Not only that. When it does start to go and needs removing - and sooner or later, it will - there will be patches that will stick like the proverbial to a blanket. The resulting work to remove it will be among the worst of your life.
I am based in NE Italy and mistakenly did my teak decks with Coelan and had to hire someone to spend two weeks in the baking sun to get it all off again when it starting failing in parts a year later (see below).
I left a small area on the aft deck that was never in direct sunlight and five years later that has started to flake away in small areas and all must be removed. I am dreading it and wondering how I can grind it all off with all the hardware mounted there without disassembling it all.
![]()
Not only that. When it does start to go and needs removing - and sooner or later, it will - there will be patches that will stick like the proverbial to a blanket. The resulting work to remove it will be among the worst of your life.
I am based in NE Italy and mistakenly did my teak decks with Coelan and had to hire someone to spend two weeks in the baking sun to get it all off again when it starting failing in parts a year later (see below).
I left a small area on the aft deck that was never in direct sunlight and five years later that has started to flake away in small areas and all must be removed. I am dreading it and wondering how I can grind it all off with all the hardware mounted there without disassembling it all.
You would be right - I was at that desperate stage of what to do with an old teak deck that should rightly have been stripped off for firewood. However, many do recommend Coelan for decks - I came to the conclusion that preparation and application should only be attempted under cover away from sun and rain and not as I did, under hot Italian sunshine and during a showery period.Yes, but the OP is only doing his louvred doors. I would never put Coelan on a deck.
I was finding that the broken part had compromised large areas that lifted in sheets; other areas were still firmly bonded to the wood. I was so disappointed that I just wanted it all off.When Coelan flakes it is normally because water has got under the edge after damage. If that happens you can just rub the offending area down until the edges are sound and then apply some more over it.
With pleasure
![]()
![]()
![]()
Wrap it up,I,ll take it with me.--where is all the teak though??![]()
To own such a craft that clearly has no expense spared to be both beautiful and yet free of that absurd wood cladding that so many aspire to, shows you are a very wise and experienced boat-owner. Deep respect.Having had teak deak on our previous boat we went out of our way to not have them on this boat.
Yes, a furnace, far too hot to walk on in bare feet. But that is also true of the bare teak, although worse with Coelan because it darkened the wood significantly with that terrible orange colour that is supposed to be an UV protection.Coelan on a deck in the Med is not a good idea,it must get too hot to walk on?
Probably not, as mentioned in an earlier post, one day was hot sun when the application seemed to dry immediately, the next heavy rain, which I had to let dry before the next coat - six in total. I accept it should have been done under cover, which was quite impossible where I was located.Was it properly applied?Did you degrease the teak with acetone before applying the primer for instance?
Yes, but the OP is only doing his louvred doors.
Yes, a furnace, far too hot to walk on in bare feet. But that is also true of the bare teak, although worse with Coelan because it darkened the wood significantly with that terrible orange colour that is supposed to be an UV protection.
The worst thing was the skating rink that the deck became when wet. Before my decision to take the lot off, I bought the glass beads to include in a further coating - still have it plus an unopened 3lt can of Ceolan (that's over €130 worth) in the depths of a locker. But it's now four years old so may not be any good.
Probably not, as mentioned in an earlier post, one day was hot sun when the application seemed to dry immediately, the next heavy rain, which I had to let dry before the next coat - six in total. I accept it should have been done under cover, which was quite impossible where I was located.
No, not acetone, but I did clean the deck thoroughly with some propriety stuff before the primer.
But the problem seemed to be the extremes of temperature that caused the caulking edges to break the seal, water would then get under and start the damage. This is one example - after the one and only summer. There are two visible problems, the two vertical seams (and many others) where the Coelan has swelled and broken over it, the second is the white part, which is a top coat flaking.
![]()
Thanks wazza, I didn't know that and I wonder if it was known and published at the time I used it, because I did read everything relevant at the time - perhaps my research was not thorough enough to include what my caulking was. But you are spot on - HR used silicon caulking through the years that my boat was built (1981); they used it instead of the more usual polyurethene-based material. However, with silicone it seems too strong and while the wood wears the seams are left proud on the deck, which, with traffic, has the risk of exerting pressure on the seams to loosen the bonding with the wood allowing water to seep in.My view of the picture is that the Coelan has come away from the caulking. The Yacht Services where I bought the product from was very insistent that I replaced the caulking, just in case it was silicone based, to a MS polymer. As Coelan does not adhere to silicone based caulking material.