aitchem
Well-Known Member
Hi,
I am considering going all TachTick in my complete refit.
Just looking for feedback.
thanks
Howard
I am considering going all TachTick in my complete refit.
Just looking for feedback.
thanks
Howard
Hi,
I am considering going all TachTick in my complete refit.
Just looking for feedback.
thanks
Howard
PS I believe only the entry level system requires the wireless nmea interface - the others have a nmea in and out built into the display unit.
My wireless system certainly sends wind, depth and speed info to the plotter and the autopilot. Dunno how, but it does, and there is an interface unit in the system somewhere.
Ian,
What I have is this plus a free fluxgate compass - the 2010 boat show special offer!
The T122 wireless nmea interface is probably what talks and listens to my plotter and autopilot, but it was installed for me and so I'm not absolutely certain.
Wired systems are unreliable enough. Why go one step higher on the risk level. If there is a wiring problem you have a chance to fix it. Wireless not working and it is game over.
Essentially, I think, because there are no junctions in a wireless system, and no copper. Remember the chemical formula : Copper + Electricity + Salt = Green Gunk.
We had a full TT system fitted in early 2006 - speed/depth/wind/GPS with three displays [one single line large digit, one double line digit and one wind]. Had initial problems with depth readings - cured by replacing original depth transducer with an Airmar.
I have had problems with the depth readings, which I think are mainly due to inhull mounting, it is generally OK on Starboard tack, but blanks at times when heeled on Port tack.
However I thought the transducers were Airmar, what did you replace yours with, and is it through or in hull?
Originally our boat had Stowe instruments and I was advised that the original Stowe depth transducer would be compatible with TT gear but, as we had frequent spurious readings in shallow water [just when you want accurate readings] we fitted the Airmar which cured the problem. Both makes were through-hull by which I mean that the transducer was in contact with the water ["through-hull" could mean that the ultrasonic signals were transmitted through the hull].