It is a low resolution photo, but you can see the anchor ball just behind the staysail.
I agree it could be displayed better (but it is there), hence why we moved it.The rule specifically says "where it can best be seen", so if that black smudge next to 5 other black smudges really is an anchor ball - (I did wonder), it still fails to comply with the rule.

Indeed I've often joked that if I could harness the "spin" then I'd make more power than my solar panels.Mine seems to act like a wind turbine, spinning if there is any breeze.
They do (unless you have a massive ball) - they just aren't as huge as you might expect - probably because they become unweildy.Wonder why ships don't have bigger balls than yachts?
How big is that ball? Looks like about a foot across to me?View attachment 199216
The anchor ball we inherited with our boat got mangled up by the previous owner. He never used to take it apart but just folded it together which meant that it never clipped together in the correct shape properly afterwards. No matter what I tried it always went a bit squished. I replaced it last year.
It’s regulation size for our vessel. See IRPCS. ‘May be proportionally smaller.’ I can’t measure it as it’s on the boat 3600 miles away.How big is that ball? Looks like about a foot across to me?
From Trawlerforum: ….I was in St'Johns Harbour in Antigua about 20 years ago when a cruise ship lost its steering and ploughed into several sailboats in the designated anchorage. The only one that was compensated was the one flying a day anchor signal.
Anyone referring to you as an idiot should have a good look in the mirror.I use an anchor ball. I also use a motoring cone when the sails are up and using the engine. I don’t do it because of insurance. I do it because it’s the regs and I’ve always done it. If that’s good reason or bad, I don’t really care. To my mind, if it’s good/rules/ insurance//safety/etc good practice to use an anchor ball. Then it is the same for a cone. One cannot argue (in my opinion)that anchor balls are essential but motoring cones aren’t. To me, that makes no logical sense. I find it far more unsafe when I see a yacht that I assume to be sailing (and therefore take action if I am motoring) only to find out they are in fact motoring. Sometimes it’s obvious. Sails flapping like crazy but yacht still making way. Other times it isn’t. I have taken avoiding action assuming the yacht is sailing in a channel etc when in fact they’re just motoring and the action I take would be different. In my opinion, motoring cones are more useful than anchoring balls. However I am prepared to be shot down for this. I haven’t posted often. Every time I do, someone shouts at me. I stand prepared to be called an idiot.
Absent any aggravating factors, prosecuting somebody in the magistrates’ court the first time the are observed without a motoring cone sounds excessive IMHO
In Belgium it does happen. A friend of mine was fined for not having his motoring cone up in Blankenberge harbour entrance. His reaction he had barely finished hoisting his mainsail did not make any difference.I've never heard of any leisure vessel being in court purely over day shapes ever in the UK, and certainly not in Chi Harbour.
I agree, although I’ve not devised a mechanism to deploy one (or retract it) from the cockpit which means that it can be more risky than an anchor ball where you are already in the right place and usually relatively calm.In my opinion, motoring cones are more useful than anchoring balls.
Yes it can be a faff I agree. I have no easy method it must be said.but I also have lifepo4 batteries so the boat may very well burn to the waterline before I get chance to hoist it in any caseI agree, although I’ve not devised a mechanism to deploy one (or retract it) from the cockpit which means that it can be more risky than an anchor ball where you are already in the right place and usually relatively calm.
I also have lifepo4 batteries so the boat may very well burn to the waterline before I get chance to hoist it in any case![]()