Startron v Soltron

  • Thread starter Deleted User YDKXO
  • Start date

DepSol

New member
Joined
6 Oct 2001
Messages
4,524
Location
Guernsey
Visit site
If you do a search you will find that Soltron in not an enzyme but a multiple of enzymes. By making sure you have the right amount of enzymes in the right combination then you indeed have a "complete formula" that does what it says it does.

I am not posting the information as to what we have on any forum or bulletn board for other people to copy or indeed contact the parties involved claiming we are frauds and they have the real Soltron, so I hope that is clear to all who ask.

There are enough forumites who have been privvy to this info and either have it on email or have seen it first hand.

Peter may think he has the right info too but how can a company who has just come on the market more recently by a substantial margin claim they have world rights when it has been used in other countries way before their birth. It doesnt add up.

Right we all agree Soltron came from Japan and is still manufactured in Japan and the legal rights are held in Japan. SO why do Solpower USA not have any link to the Japanese manufacturers and why do Japan hold all the licences an registrations?

Perrins, what I am saying is that to get a fuel additive to a NATO stock number issue means you hae to pass stringent tests, firstly upon filtration then on a number of other issues I will keep secret also as they are not for publication on a bulletin board.

Oh and one of the LAB tests for filtration was done by none other than IPC using a highly qualified well known testing facility.
 
Top