Noahsdad
Well-Known Member
I use Monel seizing wire on mine with a bit of tape.
Easier to snip and split pins are a pain. IMHO.
Easier to snip and split pins are a pain. IMHO.
I've changed all my split pins for split rings, so nothing to catch the genoa.
I have heard that using split rings in rigging screws is frowned upon primarily because they can come off but I've never understood how this can happen and it has never happened to me (touch wood).
or use lock wire.
I think I should have said clevis pins, not cotter pins. Cotter pins is what the Yanks call split pins IIRC)
I've had ring pins on blocks that have been caught (e.g. by a passing rope) and pulled straight i.e. no longer a captive ring.Just to be fully clarified, the rigging load is taken in shear by a clevis pin which is retained by a split pin[British notation] or a cotter pin [US notation]. To we Brits. a cotter pin is what used to be used to fix the bicycle crank to the bottom bracket spindle although it seems to have been replaced by a splined arrangement now. Returning to the original question, I use split pins but would prefer the ring version although I've heard that they are less secure ....any views anyone?
Returning to the original question, I use split pins but would prefer the ring version although I've heard that they are less secure ....any views anyone?
+1 for split rings. Why anyone reuses spit pin except in an emergency is beyond me.
The rings also make it easy to make adjustments.
I don't tape mine; just put them on the side that's out of harms way and on the rear facing sides of the chain plates so they are always in view.
I wouldn't be very impressed with a riggers work if he left split pins so they could catch on anything.
I'd be wondering what else he hadn't done properly?
I've use rings, and inspect them regularly. I've only twice found problems: once this year when I found the the bottom one on the forestay was a bit mangled (caught by a mooring rope, probably) and once on my last boat when I found that some cad had stolen several of them. Not quite the thing, I thought. A bit low.