Seastoke
Well-Known Member
Ok out today doing 2000 revs speed across ground 13 knots what should my log say ,cheers roy
Ok out today doing 2000 revs speed across ground 13 knots what should my log say ,cheers roy
Ok out today doing 2000 revs speed across ground 13 knots what should my log say ,cheers roy
The person I bought my boat off advertised that it would do 28knots. (with a paddle wheel log) My GPS says different.(and that was on Windemere)
The GPS gives you speed over the ground, the log gives you speed through the water.
Simply put, in zero tide they should both read the same, in 2 knots of tide against you the log should read 2 knots faster than the GPS and with 2 knots of tide behind you the log should read 2 knots slower than the GPS.
Engine revs don't come into it. The two instruments will just tell you what speed over the ground or through the water you are doing at certain revs, at a particular time, but that can vary with other factors such as wind and whether the boat has a fouled hull not...
what ever your boat is it is still moving through a moving body of water.Are these calculations still valid for a planing hulled boat?
what ever your boat is it is still moving through a moving body of water.
think areoplanes in wind
Imagine you drove your car along the wagons of a train. If the train is doing 30 mph and you remain stationary your speedo (the log) will indicate 0 mph but the gps would show 30 mph. Drive in the same direction as the train at 30 mph on the speedo (log) and your speed over the ground (GPS) is 60 mph.
If you turn the car around and stop the speedo (log) will read zero mph but your speed over the ground (GPS) will be 30 mph backwards. If you drive the car forwards at 30 mph on the speedo (log) it will have a relative speed over the ground (GPS) of zero.
Henry![]()
Einstein seems to have proven this one, but for this to be true then as the distance the light travels over a given time, which in simple terms differs for the two examples given, for the principle that the speed of light is constant, regardless of the moving speed of the observer, then the other factor of the speed equation, distance over time, then it is time that must alter, relative to the speed of one observer relative to another. This is Einsteins Special Theory of Relativity, but not sure this is the right forum for this one.Ahh - Henry
I always have this argument with the kids - not 30 MPH though.
Imaging sitting in a stationary train - how fast is the beam of light coming out of the front of the engine?
Yep - correct - the speed of light
Right now move the train forwards at 30MPH
How fast is the beam of light now traveling as it leaves the engine?
Einstein recons that it is still traveling at the speed of light.
This is where I recon that Einstein is wrong
The kids recon I'm wrong and that Einstein has proved his case.
However, I still stand by my theory that the beam of light is now traveling at the speed of light + 30MPH
Sorry guys - I know this is totally different - just wanted to change this silly discussion into something sillier.
The GPS gives you speed over the ground, the log gives you speed through the water.
Simply put, in zero tide they should both read the same, in 2 knots of tide against you the log should read 2 knots faster than the GPS and with 2 knots of tide behind you the log should read 2 knots slower than the GPS.
Engine revs don't come into it. The two instruments will just tell you what speed over the ground or through the water you are doing at certain revs, at a particular time, but that can vary with other factors such as wind and whether the boat has a fouled hull not...
Are these calculations still valid for a planing hulled boat?
Ahh - Henry
I always have this argument with the kids - not 30 MPH though.
Imaging sitting in a stationary train - how fast is the beam of light coming out of the front of the engine?
Yep - correct - the speed of light
Right now move the train forwards at 30MPH
How fast is the beam of light now traveling as it leaves the engine?
Einstein recons that it is still traveling at the speed of light.
This is where I recon that Einstein is wrong
The kids recon I'm wrong and that Einstein has proved his case.
However, I still stand by my theory that the beam of light is now traveling at the speed of light + 30MPH
Sorry guys - I know this is totally different - just wanted to change this silly discussion into something sillier.