SL 400 Toilet

Hardley

New member
Joined
7 Jan 2003
Messages
341
Location
Norfolk Broads
Visit site
Started servicing my toilet today, some scale and gunge in the system, have most parts soaking in vinegar, but am concerned about any effects the vinegar may have on rubber parts.
Any advice gladly accepted.
Norm

<hr width=100% size=1>
 

snowleopard

Active member
Joined
16 May 2001
Messages
33,645
Location
Oxford
Visit site
should be fine. if you're lucky you may still be able to find a spares kit which contains all the rubber bits and springs apart from the main diaphragm.

<hr width=100% size=1>
 

HeadMistress

New member
Joined
9 Sep 2003
Messages
872
Location
USA
Visit site
Soaking rubber parts in vinegar will cause them to swell and distort. However, if it's been at least 5 years since they were replaced, it's time to replace 'em anyway, so it hasn't cost you anything.

A cupful of white vinegar flushed down the toilet--provided it's flushed completely out of the pump--once a week will not hurt the rubber parts...and will prevent sea water scale and urine crystal buildup in the toilet and the head discharge hose.

<hr width=100% size=1>Peggie Hall
Specializing in marine sanitation since 1987
 

Hardley

New member
Joined
7 Jan 2003
Messages
341
Location
Norfolk Broads
Visit site
Thanks for your advice, I was worried about the rubber as it is not possible to get spare parts for this toilet any more. Might try soaking in hot water and a gentle scrape.

<hr width=100% size=1>
 

PuffTheMagicDragon

Active member
Joined
16 May 2001
Messages
14,405
Visit site
Very true! When I had to replace the large nylon moulding, that had cracked near the flange, three or four years ago, the kit cost me just about a half of what a new Par, Rm69, or similar plunger type would have cost.
There is no doubt in my mind as to what I will do should there be a next time round.
Fair Winds!

<hr width=100% size=1>Wally
 

snowleopard

Active member
Joined
16 May 2001
Messages
33,645
Location
Oxford
Visit site
if only i could get rid of mine but there's nothing remotely like it for fitting into tight spaces.

<hr width=100% size=1>
 

Keith

New member
Joined
9 Dec 2003
Messages
211
Location
andros bahamas
Visit site
Know what you mean, i had to rebuild the heads completely anyway as the boat was old enough not to have a holding tank, but those little springs were driving me insane, they reall are not quite up to liveaboard use IMO.......keith

<hr width=100% size=1>
 

snowleopard

Active member
Joined
16 May 2001
Messages
33,645
Location
Oxford
Visit site
those little springs are a total pain. the last spares pack actually contained 4 of them so it puts off the day when i have to have new ones made.

the pump body wore out on one of mine (a pivot axle craked out of the moulding) so i bought a new one from yacht parts plymouth. £185, twice the price of a complete new par. at least i effectively have a new loo so it should be a while before they're scrap.

why can't other manufacturers make heads suitable for mounting close to the hull side?

<hr width=100% size=1>
 

snowleopard

Active member
Joined
16 May 2001
Messages
33,645
Location
Oxford
Visit site
funny you shoud say that. ours broke in the azores. the welders put it back at the wrong angle. sitting down in a seaway became something of a gamble /forums/images/icons/smile.gif

<hr width=100% size=1>
 

trouville

N/A
Joined
10 Jun 2004
Messages
2,839
Location
crusing with an Arpège
Visit site
Ive had two other toilets on two other boat, and each time ive found them unreliable, and replaced them with second hand blake, and when i had my first baby blake i thought it was awful with two basic pumps! After the first day with a SL 400 i was down to the second hand shop where id seen a oval blake,which i bought foe £100 They seem to be very popular as mine was stolen just day after getting it and after removing the old one which i gave away, but not having fitted the new one! Still a buckets not that bad.
Im still hopeing to find another baby blake or large blake. In the mean time im not sure wether a bucket isent better than an easy modern boat loo

<hr width=100% size=1>liveaboard
 

dickh

New member
Joined
8 Feb 2002
Messages
2,431
Location
Suffolk
Visit site
I too think the SL400 is rubbish - apart from the fact spares are difficult to get hold of. On two boats I've replaced them almost immediately with a Par/Jabsco toilet - much better and you can at least get spares.

<hr width=100% size=1>dickh
I'd rather be sailing... :) /forums/images/icons/smile.gif
 

Keith

New member
Joined
9 Dec 2003
Messages
211
Location
andros bahamas
Visit site
Isn't it funny some of the stories we can come up with concerning our sea toilets, had to smile at yours though....imagination ran wild.....but then with that many moving parts operating in an environment as hostile as the average heads!!!...what do we expect.........really nothing short of a miracle.......keith

<hr width=100% size=1>
 

celandine

Active member
Joined
12 Mar 2002
Messages
1,667
Location
Suffolk/Brittany
Visit site
In my experience among the numerous things that can go wrong with the SL400 is that one of its 'heart-type' valves can turn it self inside out and start working in reverse - giving a whole new meaning to the phrase getting your own back
I'm told that rather than strip the whole thing down, you can force the valve back into its proper shape with judicious use of a marina water hose; which is why I never let such hoses get near my fresh water system without cleaning the bottom few feet vary carefully.

I would replace it with a Blake as soon as you can.

Mick

Mick

<hr width=100% size=1>. . . . . . .<A target="_blank" HREF=http://www.marinersboatyard.co.uk>boatyard</A>
 
Top