There isn't much "group synergy" with the other brands that Oxford have bought in the past ("Automotive Metal Formed Systems Provider", "Community Banks"), but does that matter?
part of an investment company whose strategy for Sealine is....?
Is this good news?
Starategy is to create value and make money. You rarely do that by running a business down. Far more likely they will support and grow the business, and only cut off things (business lines, models, people) that need to be cut off. Sealine has gone from being owned by a conglomerate that doesn't want to own it to being owned by a bunch of smart people who do want to own it. Good news
being owned by a bunch of smart people who do want to own it.
Do you know that first hand J?a bunch of smart people
The strategy for most companies of their type is to trim costs, raise the price per unit, sell off anything which makes money, like say freeholds, and then lease back etc.
Then flog the company to a mug punter for as much as you can get
Do you know that first hand J?
It seems to me that what Oxford did - or better said, tried to do - with Fountain Powerboats wasn't that smart...
Agreed, but since we drifted slightly o/t discussing the "smartness" of those guys, any sort of business management situation is valid, I suppose. I mentioned Fountain only because I followed that case a bit.It's not really a comparable situation
Agreed, but since we drifted slightly o/t discussing the "smartness" of those guys, any sort of business management situation is valid, I suppose. I mentioned Fountain only because I followed that case a bit.