Sailing Yacht A impounded

westhinder

Well-known member
Joined
15 Feb 2003
Messages
2,541
Location
Belgium
Visit site
I remember being at a meeting and discussing the old British cars we had owned with a Finn. We both had Princesses and noted that the passenger foot well was always soaking. We also had Hillman Hunters where the driver's door would fly open when you went around a roundabout (I had that one in Milton Keynes). Ah, British car design. Luckily the marine sector was better served.
My parents had a Princess too, and as I recall, the design was far from the worst aspect, it was just a poor car mechanically. On a damp day it was always uncertain if it was going to start or not. We became experts at drying out the vital parts with a hairdryer on a long lead.
 

LONG_KEELER

Well-known member
Joined
21 Jul 2009
Messages
3,721
Location
East Coast
Visit site
Quite a few Austin Princesses had an additional set of creases in the boot as rear visibility was bad and the bumper didn't overhang enough.
e5f4049730414af7ec543bb054b619b8.jpg
I had one. First car I owned that had power steering. I seem to remember having the smell of burnt oil . I also had a 1.8 Morris Marina and an Morris Ital. Shame I couldn't complete the set with an Allegro. All were company cars so I had no choice, and they had to be British.
 

capnsensible

Well-known member
Joined
15 Mar 2007
Messages
46,645
Location
Atlantic
Visit site
:rolleyes:
No. As Keats put it:
‘Beauty is truth, truth beauty - that is all Ye know on earth, and all ye need to know.’
It‘s a dog and that is the indisputable truth. That you think different doesn’t make it true. Beauty is not essentially subjective.
Opinion is not truth. I'm surprised you can't understand that......
 

Bobc

Well-known member
Joined
20 Jan 2011
Messages
10,175
Visit site
That's hope they either use it as accommodation for Ukrainian refugees, or they sink the ugly monstrosity.
 

capnsensible

Well-known member
Joined
15 Mar 2007
Messages
46,645
Location
Atlantic
Visit site
It's clear then that modern cutting edge design advances don't appeal much to the old and grumpies.

I'm sure the WesterlyCentaur Solent Squadron are outraged.

:sneaky:
 

lustyd

Well-known member
Joined
27 Jul 2010
Messages
12,503
Visit site
While what that article says may be reasonable it ignores that these are almost certainly bought with bank loans which can no longer be paid due to other sanctions so the situation may well become even stranger as I can’t imagine banks would want to take ownership.
 

dgadee

Well-known member
Joined
13 Oct 2010
Messages
3,986
Visit site
While what that article says may be reasonable it ignores that these are almost certainly bought with bank loans which can no longer be paid due to other sanctions so the situation may well become even stranger as I can’t imagine banks would want to take ownership.

Plenty of wealth in our new world order. I'm sure someone will buy them cheaply at auction.
 

lustyd

Well-known member
Joined
27 Jul 2010
Messages
12,503
Visit site
Plenty of wealth in our new world order. I'm sure someone will buy them cheaply at auction.
Oh for sure, and the tax payer will almost certainly foot the bill. I just wish I'd understood such schemes earlier in life so I could be on the other side of the equation!
 

laika

Well-known member
Joined
6 Apr 2011
Messages
8,209
Location
London / Gosport
Visit site
It's clear then that modern cutting edge design advances don't appeal much to the old and grumpies.

Just because something doesn't look "traditional" doesn't mean it's "cutting edge". Are you referring to the aesthetic or the technologies required to implement it? If the former...it looks aggressive and militaristic. That kind of works for (motor) Yacht A but presumably whether to not it works for you depends on whether you think the projection of those qualities says something positive in the context of a sailing vessel. Which of course it isn't really which brings us to the point about technology: Unlike the Maltese Falcon which did make use of innovative technologies to produce a radical *actual* sailing vessel, if we assume that Melnichenko isn't driven by a concern to save a few bob on fuel bills with sail assistance that means that those enormous masts and the technology to produce them were purely for the look of it. Is something which takes huge cost and technology to produce for no significant functional benefit "good design"? Or simply an outrageous waste of resources for an ostentatious show of wealth and power?

Plus of course Starck would have been in his 60s when he designed that so hardly a young gun. But then I'm not a pensioner and these things are subjective..
 
Last edited:
Top