ylop
Well-Known Member
My complainant was whingeing that the harbour would not renew annual moorings if the boat didn't leave the harbour. Sensible approach to have that as a requirement.
It seems like a logical rule at first glance, but the thing about logical rules is they can have unintended consequences:I'm guessing the same people are the ones who would be on a committee tasked with considering such a rule, and turkeys generally do not vote for Christmas.
- someone launches in April, but gets sick and doesn’t sail all season, are the banned from the mooring the following season even if healed?
- what if they have an engine problem that prevents them going anywhere but they replace the engine over winter?
- or having not been used for the season the owner dies but his wife/child wants to use it the following season?
- or does it mean that people do one trip a year just to qualify - regardless of capability, fitness, seaworthiness etc. with consequent increased risks.
- or evicted from his mooring is he likely to clutter the yard ashore preventing his new replacement on the mooring from finding winter storage?
It might actually be better to put prices up so that people need to think about whether they are wasting money and reinvest the surplus in better facilities / programmes that get a wider audience into boats!