S23; S25 what went wrong

Seastoke

Well-Known Member
Joined
20 Sep 2011
Messages
13,733
Visit site
With them so popular why stop making them ,and why don’t firms that are still building boats make sports boats similar ,to trail os first time buyers.
 
Really great boats and Sealine were very successful at easing the transition through the range. For me it was S195 to S23 to S37. Their trade ins were super generous I think to the point of not making enough on the deal but hoping to make it on the next one.
 
Really great boats and Sealine were very successful at easing the transition through the range. For me it was S195 to S23 to S37. Their trade ins were super generous I think to the point of not making enough on the deal but hoping to make it on the next one.

Yes, they were brilliant at keeping you in the brand. For us it was 195, 255, 290, 330, 420, F44, F42/5 and finally T47. It all went a bit pear shaped when Tom sold out and the money men came in.
 
That’s super brand loyalty and not uncommon for fans of the Sealine brand. I guess it’s hard to be both in the volume requirements of smaller boats and the tailored requirements of the larger boats at the same time......and the bit in between.
 
With them so popular why stop making them ,and why don’t firms that are still building boats make sports boats similar ,to trail os first time buyers.

For the same reasons as there are few similar size sailboats built. There is no demand at the price needed to make a profit and the market is stuffed with cheap used boats from the time when they were produced in quantity.

Add to that the entry level market has shrunk because of the lack of money available to the target demographic. That is families can no longer afford to buy a new boat or prefer to spend their leisure funds in different ways.
 
The Sealine dealer I bought my S24 from, said that Sealine made almost zero profit on these boats, but they got people into the brand.
£50k for an S24, £95k for an S28, £130k for an S34, £160k for an S37 ... there was an upgrade path that non-squillionaires could follow.
 
The Sealine dealer I bought my S24 from, said that Sealine made almost zero profit on these boats, but they got people into the brand.
£50k for an S24, £95k for an S28, £130k for an S34, £160k for an S37 ... there was an upgrade path that non-squillionaires could follow.

But I guess if you spend your 50k on a used 34, they sell a new 37.
They just have to hope you build up the same brand loyalty with an older boat.
 
The Sealine dealer I bought my S24 from, said that Sealine made almost zero profit on these boats, but they got people into the brand.
£50k for an S24, £95k for an S28, £130k for an S34, £160k for an S37 ... there was an upgrade path that non-squillionaires could follow.

In 1995 build time was, 210 .. 6 days, 240 .. 6 days, 270.. 8 days, 310 .. 8 days, 360 .. 8 days, 330S .. 7 days, 360S .. 9 days

So there you have your build cost, not a lot different in build, but a lot in selling, so why ake 210 when you can make 240's for twice the price. It did kill the sell them a 210, the make your money on the upgrade to a 240.

Brian
 
Yes, they were brilliant at keeping you in the brand. For us it was 195, 255, 290, 330, 420, F44, F42/5 and finally T47. It all went a bit pear shaped when Tom sold out and the money men came in.

We can almost match you, 255,290,310 Statesman,F33(new) S37, S37(new),S41 and S48. The S37 was one of Sealine's best, though our S48 was a real beast and could be taken almost anywhere in almost anything!
 
scary build times... or is it just me.

Tom was a production engineer before boat builder, all boats had fully pre built looms, all normal option items were fitted as standard, any non standard options pre-wired in loom, the switch panels were all plug and socket, so it took a minute or two to fit the switch panel. All the furniture was pre-built modules, helm was totally pre-built, all based on moving boats out of the door

Production engineering is a art we seam to have lost in this country.

Brian
 
If Cockwells could get the Duchy 27 to the boat show for £100k it would sell like hot cakes. But it's £140k plus options plus vat. Lovely as it is, that's just too spendy.
 
We can almost match you, 255,290,310 Statesman,F33(new) S37, S37(new),S41 and S48. The S37 was one of Sealine's best, though our S48 was a real beast and could be taken almost anywhere in almost anything!

Ray Hankey has us both beaten. I think he had thirteen before eventually succumbing to the charms of a Broome but that was long after Tom had sold out.

All our boats looked after us well. We took the larger ones as far north as Bergen, as far south as Santander, as far west as Fastnet and as far east as Fyn in Denmark. Our favourite was the T47, mainly because of its size and sea keeping. It was run very close by the F42 with the clever extending cockpit. It was good to pay marina charges for a 42 footer with the facilities of a 45 footer! All were new boats except for the last. Sealine always made an offer we couldn't refuse when it came to time to change. returning all or most of the cost of the trade in. The cost to change for new was just too much when it came to the T47, which was our first second hand boat
 
Because a new one would cost over £100,000 these days. Not many people would buy a brand new 25' boat for that price.
Why not? People bought a S24 for £50k 20 years ago (not me).
That must be not far off £100k now - in real terms.

This is what you get nearly new for £100k and 25ft? How about this.........
http://www.newark-marina.co.uk/used-boats/four-winns-v255/
I don't find it very attractive. Comparing that to a S23 or S25 for £30k ish and even if adding for refurb such as a new canopy and upholstery the older boat makes more sense.
 
Top