I’d like to put in a positive word for Ryde. The discussion has quickly changed from a report on silting to commentary on how poor Ryde Harbour is, followed by disparaging comments about a great deal of the Isle of Wight. Ryde Harbour is in a lovely location, it remains affordable to stay there while other Solent mooring fees have gone wild. The harbour team are always friendly and helpful.
I understand that the silting started when the large flood relief outfall east of the harbour was moved inside the harbour. We can agree that this has unexpectedly triggered a major silting problem but let’s not forget that the harbour had been operating happily for years before that. The entrance was dredged when the silting first occurred and clearly it needs doing again, together with a rethink on what can be done to alleviate the impact of the of the relocated outfall. I did hear that it was expected that the outfall would have benefited the harbour through a sluicing effect. I do understand that this is against a backdrop of the harbour being put up for sale at least twice and moves by the town to try take over harbour ownership from the island authorities.
Is there a design fault with the in-harbour outfall? Undoubtedly, just like the design faults of Cowes breakwater and new chain ferry. Did the harbour team bring this upon themselves? No. My fear is that if any island council officers read this thread they could easily conclude that closing the seemingly unloved harbour is the simplest way forward. What a disaster this would be, especially for the many permanently berthed there. Ryde has a lot to offer. I just hope there is sufficient budget in these times of financial hardship to find a solution to the newly formed silting.
We used to go there a lot when the kids were small. At the time we had a bilge keel boat drawing 1.2m and we struggled to get in and out at neaps.Ryde is great if you have shallow draft and children ...