lustyd
Well-Known Member
To be fair, they are required to ensure data is up to date or to remove it. This is partly why cg66 was closed as it couldn’t/wouldn’t comply with modern data protection laws.
They must know how many times it has initiated a rescue. I suspect very few - the type of person who uses it are the type of person who has multiple means of calling for help so almost never gets to shore contact reporting overdue as the first trigger.It's kind of comedic that it went from essential to completely unavailable without every going through a period where it was "Vaguely useful, use it of you want.".
I've never heard a CG in an emergency say "Ahh, yes, we've found your photo on CG66/SafeTrx so we know what you look like.". Maybe they used it, but I have my doubts.
Did they ever say essential or was that your emphasis.The RYA SAFETRAX system was touted by both the RYA, and the responsible UK Government authority, the MCA, as an essential safety system for all water users.
Interestingly I’ve never heard them do that but if 10 yrs in they are having to do it - perhaps it’s evidence that it wasn’t really fit for modern boating?Even late this season HMCG operations rooms were (fairly f9rcefully) directing users at sea to use only SAFETRAX. See my prev post reference above).
Was CG66 withdrawn because of Safetrx or was Safetrx partially introduced because CG66 had to go? I’m not sure CG66 or the database of boats in Safetrx is really a “safety system” - knowing my boat has blue spray hood and sail bag and carries a life raft isn’t going to tell them much. Perhaps if they find my boat washed up ashore it might give them contact details for me. But I’m generally a bit sceptical that a database of inevitably patchy boat details is actually that amazing.As a result of it's introduction, other pre existing HMCG safety systems were "withdrawn".
And yes nobody has since has a problem contacting HMCG on Ch16! It’s almost like the boating community gets upset about changes that actually cause no harm!(Don't forget, HMCG long-since gave up their dedicated heed set watch on Ch 16.)
No public money as far as I know, but if you are annoyed it is going it’s hard to argue it wasn’t a good use of the funds for the 10 yrs it was there!Public/members Money/time was spent,
That we can be certain of!money was perhaps "saved"? Doubtless, many meetings were held...
I’ve never used a bingo/gaming app in my life. I’ve not made the comparison - but building apps and maintaining them is resource intensive. Someone has to pay for that. This was a commercial product the RYA licensed in. They have decided to discontinue it. If you are annoyed RYA member by all means tell them how sad you are and that you want them to make a replacement. If you aren’t a member then like all free things - nobody owes it to you to keep providing for free!It's not some sort of bingo/gaming /shopping app, so why do you continue to excuse it as such?
I have no idea how you were supposed to hear about it. Have you asked the people you have a contract with? The details are in the license agreement within the app.Apparently, even as a registered user (aka "stakeholder??) I was supposed to learn of its demise only via "social media"?
Certainly a valid concern although it may be that protecting that data is what makes it hard for them to message you.This doesn't reinforce my faith in their abilities to actually use effectively the data they already hold.
are you going to be unable to go boating on Jan 2nd without an app watching over you?Who then is responsible for this fiasco?
Why does it need anything?What will replace it? When?
I think AIS is probably a better tool! But if your objective is just to share your location with a loved one there are multiple options:Looks like I need to invest, perhaps in AIS?
AIS is not mandatory. It will only be useful if someone is looking for you / knows you might be overdue. A PLB might be a better tool for alerting your need for help, or the latest phones (and even some watches) now have satellite SOS capability. But of course that won’t help if you have been taken unwell of knocked out (actually some of the watches claim to detect if you are motionless but perhaps won’t work at sea?)A a statutory mandated system it will be harder for them to ignore this?
I’ve never met anyone who relied on Safetrx - my guess is perhaps 20% of leisure boaters were using it some of the time. The last time I did an RYA course, with experienced sailors about half had heard of it but none had used it except me. The only people I know who actually use it religiously are a group of sea kayakers. A group not even within the RYA remit!However this will not be possible for many at-risk water users, who might previously relied on systems that have been haphazardly implemented, and then quietly abandoned.
I know a number of people here probably think the same as you (and I've met some in real life).I have never used Safetrx as a ".... tell somone I'm overdue" service, nor do I call the CG and tell them I'm setting off from X towards Y as I know a few people do. However I have always thought that a CG accessible database of basic boat details and a decent photo would be useful, hence putting my boat and personal data into CG66 and then Safetrx.
It might, but would they know enough to mean the CG could confidently identify it?If your shore contact called in but didn’t know the specifics of the boat in question then there would be some value?
You didn’t need the app to set up the boat and contact details on the database (CG66 replacement) - many of us did that using the web screens instead of the app.I downloaded the App when it first started but a couple of weeks ago I deleted it mainly because I had never used it and the couple of times I had tried to use it struggled with it.
hello (at) email . rya . org . ukNot that I can see, what address was it from?
So perhaps only emailing people who used the tracking function, not the people who only added details to the database?hello (at) email . rya . org . uk
Mine arrived mid afternoon.
It starts:
Dear user,
According to our records you are somebody who has actively used the sail plan or track only mode in RYA SafeTrx. For this reason we are giving you advance notice that RYA’s SafeTrx (the UK version of the Safetrx app), will be closing at the end of this year.
Perhaps they are messaging people in batches depending on use pattern?
That seems to be the case with me, certainly.So perhaps only emailing people who used the tracking function, not the people who only added details to the database?
Agreed. I do not expect an e mail. Filled in the data base but felt safetrx was for small boats near base.So perhaps only emailing people who used the tracking function, not the people who only added details to the database?
I have the app, an account and have entered boat details but never used the tracking function. No email received.So perhaps only emailing people who used the tracking function, not the people who only added details to the database?
But I think you match what I said - per the information in post #52, as you have never used the tracking function they would not have included you in that mailing.Not in my case. I have the app, an account and have entered boat details but never used the tracking function. No email received.
I had a cg66 then a SafeTrx file. I always thought it most useful if I or more probably my partner could only get the DSC red button call out in distress, without the voice call to follow. As part of our safety plan if I go overboard, I have always stressed to her the most important part of a distress call is the red button, spending minutes down below on the radio could be fatal, so just reach down the companionway and press the red button while keeping an eye on me in the water. The radio will probably get lively with calls from the coastguard, but if I’m MOB, I told her to prioritise getting the boat back to me, over answering their questions. If possible just call back with something simple like “this is yacht Foxtrot, man overboard!” and leave the radio again. The coastguard should be able to cross reference our mmsi to our SafeTrx info.I know a number of people here probably think the same as you (and I've met some in real life).
I'm struggling a bit to picture the situation where that would make a real difference; it doesn't stop them asking you for all the information when you call them with a problem. Perhaps it helps if a boat washes up on the shore?