RYA SafeTrx Is Closing Down 31 December 2025

To be fair, they are required to ensure data is up to date or to remove it. This is partly why cg66 was closed as it couldn’t/wouldn’t comply with modern data protection laws.
 
It's kind of comedic that it went from essential to completely unavailable without every going through a period where it was "Vaguely useful, use it of you want.".

I've never heard a CG in an emergency say "Ahh, yes, we've found your photo on CG66/SafeTrx so we know what you look like.". Maybe they used it, but I have my doubts.
They must know how many times it has initiated a rescue. I suspect very few - the type of person who uses it are the type of person who has multiple means of calling for help so almost never gets to shore contact reporting overdue as the first trigger.
 
The RYA SAFETRAX system was touted by both the RYA, and the responsible UK Government authority, the MCA, as an essential safety system for all water users.
Did they ever say essential or was that your emphasis.
Even late this season HMCG operations rooms were (fairly f9rcefully) directing users at sea to use only SAFETRAX. See my prev post reference above).
Interestingly I’ve never heard them do that but if 10 yrs in they are having to do it - perhaps it’s evidence that it wasn’t really fit for modern boating?
As a result of it's introduction, other pre existing HMCG safety systems were "withdrawn".
Was CG66 withdrawn because of Safetrx or was Safetrx partially introduced because CG66 had to go? I’m not sure CG66 or the database of boats in Safetrx is really a “safety system” - knowing my boat has blue spray hood and sail bag and carries a life raft isn’t going to tell them much. Perhaps if they find my boat washed up ashore it might give them contact details for me. But I’m generally a bit sceptical that a database of inevitably patchy boat details is actually that amazing.
(Don't forget, HMCG long-since gave up their dedicated heed set watch on Ch 16.)
And yes nobody has since has a problem contacting HMCG on Ch16! It’s almost like the boating community gets upset about changes that actually cause no harm!
Public/members Money/time was spent,
No public money as far as I know, but if you are annoyed it is going it’s hard to argue it wasn’t a good use of the funds for the 10 yrs it was there!
money was perhaps "saved"? Doubtless, many meetings were held...
That we can be certain of!
It's not some sort of bingo/gaming /shopping app, so why do you continue to excuse it as such?
I’ve never used a bingo/gaming app in my life. I’ve not made the comparison - but building apps and maintaining them is resource intensive. Someone has to pay for that. This was a commercial product the RYA licensed in. They have decided to discontinue it. If you are annoyed RYA member by all means tell them how sad you are and that you want them to make a replacement. If you aren’t a member then like all free things - nobody owes it to you to keep providing for free!
Apparently, even as a registered user (aka "stakeholder??) I was supposed to learn of its demise only via "social media"?
I have no idea how you were supposed to hear about it. Have you asked the people you have a contract with? The details are in the license agreement within the app.
This doesn't reinforce my faith in their abilities to actually use effectively the data they already hold.
Certainly a valid concern although it may be that protecting that data is what makes it hard for them to message you.
Who then is responsible for this fiasco?
are you going to be unable to go boating on Jan 2nd without an app watching over you?
What will replace it? When?
Why does it need anything?
Looks like I need to invest, perhaps in AIS?
I think AIS is probably a better tool! But if your objective is just to share your location with a loved one there are multiple options:
- what’s app lets you share your location for a fixed period of time
- google maps lets you share your location indefinitely or for a fixed period
- navionics app lets you share location (and possibly planned route?) with others, may require a subscription

I am sure there are others. The only feature of the passage plans not available elsewhere is the overdue “escalation” text messages which I think is a good feature but is clunky when in poor signal areas.

The days of people going to sea and not speaking to a loved one until they come ashore and find a phone box are over.
A a statutory mandated system it will be harder for them to ignore this?
AIS is not mandatory. It will only be useful if someone is looking for you / knows you might be overdue. A PLB might be a better tool for alerting your need for help, or the latest phones (and even some watches) now have satellite SOS capability. But of course that won’t help if you have been taken unwell of knocked out (actually some of the watches claim to detect if you are motionless but perhaps won’t work at sea?)
However this will not be possible for many at-risk water users, who might previously relied on systems that have been haphazardly implemented, and then quietly abandoned.
I’ve never met anyone who relied on Safetrx - my guess is perhaps 20% of leisure boaters were using it some of the time. The last time I did an RYA course, with experienced sailors about half had heard of it but none had used it except me. The only people I know who actually use it religiously are a group of sea kayakers. A group not even within the RYA remit!

I think you are mislabeling Safetrx as though it was some amazing safety system when it was a basic log of vessel details, a location tracker and some crude rules for escalating. Perhaps its most powerful feature was the way they handled privacy by not giving any of that info to HMCG until a problem was escalated - but I don’t know who was particularly worried about sharing that with UK CG anyway.
 
I have never used Safetrx as a ".... tell somone I'm overdue" service, nor do I call the CG and tell them I'm setting off from X towards Y as I know a few people do. However I have always thought that a CG accessible database of basic boat details and a decent photo would be useful, hence putting my boat and personal data into CG66 and then Safetrx.
 
I have never used Safetrx as a ".... tell somone I'm overdue" service, nor do I call the CG and tell them I'm setting off from X towards Y as I know a few people do. However I have always thought that a CG accessible database of basic boat details and a decent photo would be useful, hence putting my boat and personal data into CG66 and then Safetrx.
I know a number of people here probably think the same as you (and I've met some in real life).
I'm struggling a bit to picture the situation where that would make a real difference; it doesn't stop them asking you for all the information when you call them with a problem. Perhaps it helps if a boat washes up on the shore?
 
I downloaded the App when it first started but a couple of weeks ago I deleted it mainly because I had never used it and the couple of times I had tried to use it struggled with it.
 
I downloaded the App when it first started but a couple of weeks ago I deleted it mainly because I had never used it and the couple of times I had tried to use it struggled with it.
You didn’t need the app to set up the boat and contact details on the database (CG66 replacement) - many of us did that using the web screens instead of the app.
The app was only needed for the voyage tracking function. And deleting the app will not (I would expect) have deleted your boat records from the database.
 
Not that I can see, what address was it from?
hello (at) email . rya . org . uk

Mine arrived mid afternoon.

It starts:


Dear user,

According to our records you are somebody who has actively used the sail plan or track only mode in RYA SafeTrx. For this reason we are giving you advance notice that RYA’s SafeTrx (the UK version of the Safetrx app), will be closing at the end of this year.

Perhaps they are messaging people in batches depending on use pattern?
 
hello (at) email . rya . org . uk

Mine arrived mid afternoon.

It starts:


Dear user,

According to our records you are somebody who has actively used the sail plan or track only mode in RYA SafeTrx. For this reason we are giving you advance notice that RYA’s SafeTrx (the UK version of the Safetrx app), will be closing at the end of this year.

Perhaps they are messaging people in batches depending on use pattern?
So perhaps only emailing people who used the tracking function, not the people who only added details to the database?
 
So perhaps only emailing people who used the tracking function, not the people who only added details to the database?
Agreed. I do not expect an e mail. Filled in the data base but felt safetrx was for small boats near base.
I felt I may invoke false calls being out of phone signal so never used tge tracking.
 
I can imagine SafeTrx being a significant hassle, as over due boats have well meaning contacts reporting them overdue to the CG, when, in the majority of time, there was no issue. Who would want a system like that, in an organization that needs to improve productivity and lower costs.
 
Last edited:
I know a number of people here probably think the same as you (and I've met some in real life).
I'm struggling a bit to picture the situation where that would make a real difference; it doesn't stop them asking you for all the information when you call them with a problem. Perhaps it helps if a boat washes up on the shore?
I had a cg66 then a SafeTrx file. I always thought it most useful if I or more probably my partner could only get the DSC red button call out in distress, without the voice call to follow. As part of our safety plan if I go overboard, I have always stressed to her the most important part of a distress call is the red button, spending minutes down below on the radio could be fatal, so just reach down the companionway and press the red button while keeping an eye on me in the water. The radio will probably get lively with calls from the coastguard, but if I’m MOB, I told her to prioritise getting the boat back to me, over answering their questions. If possible just call back with something simple like “this is yacht Foxtrot, man overboard!” and leave the radio again. The coastguard should be able to cross reference our mmsi to our SafeTrx info.
 
Last edited:
Top