rob2
Well-Known Member
Is it just me, or does the "new" NHC look just like the remnants of the PY? Certainly the list of base numbers seems to be the same as the last one for the PY and the development of the system requires the same returns from clubs. The only meaningful difference I can see is that clubs are now required to buy and use an "approved" software to process results. Bearing in mind that many clubs had long ago given up sending in returns, what incentive is there for them to support a new system with added costs? I have asked the same questions on the RYA site and look forward to posting their reply.
It surprised me that I could see no evidence that the new system was designed to allow entry from the systems currently in use both by UK clubs or those in other countries. For a cruiser who wants to do a few races a year, it is more likely that the RO will accept a few comparitive figures from Byron Software or similar, rather than have each boat hauled out to submit photos to the RYA for a rating. Is it just that all the clubs were a decade ahead of the RYA and have already invested in a working software system or do they all work in isolation?
Rob.
It surprised me that I could see no evidence that the new system was designed to allow entry from the systems currently in use both by UK clubs or those in other countries. For a cruiser who wants to do a few races a year, it is more likely that the RO will accept a few comparitive figures from Byron Software or similar, rather than have each boat hauled out to submit photos to the RYA for a rating. Is it just that all the clubs were a decade ahead of the RYA and have already invested in a working software system or do they all work in isolation?
Rob.