D
Deleted member 36384
Guest
Hello,
My Rival 41C does not go backwards very well. Her stern turns to port when under reverse power and when neutral is selected the port turn continues even with rudder blade is pointing to starboard. The hull is a deep forefoot, encapsulated, long and thick fin. The propellor is a 3 bladed job and she is over propped.
The stern gear travel is limited to about 35 degrees and there are massive stops glassed into the hull to prevent the rudder stock tiller arm from going any further. I understand that around the 35 degrees is the maximum angle and anything after that simply results in more drag and less desirable flow being deflected to turn the boat.
My query is this. When going astern is the rule much the same, or if I could turn the rudder more more would the stern change of direction be more pronounced and thus beneficial for coping astern direction, especially with the propellor not turning?
What do you think?
Thanks,
BlowingOldBoots
My Rival 41C does not go backwards very well. Her stern turns to port when under reverse power and when neutral is selected the port turn continues even with rudder blade is pointing to starboard. The hull is a deep forefoot, encapsulated, long and thick fin. The propellor is a 3 bladed job and she is over propped.
The stern gear travel is limited to about 35 degrees and there are massive stops glassed into the hull to prevent the rudder stock tiller arm from going any further. I understand that around the 35 degrees is the maximum angle and anything after that simply results in more drag and less desirable flow being deflected to turn the boat.
My query is this. When going astern is the rule much the same, or if I could turn the rudder more more would the stern change of direction be more pronounced and thus beneficial for coping astern direction, especially with the propellor not turning?
What do you think?
Thanks,
BlowingOldBoots