m_rk_st_v_ns
New member
I just commissioned and received a 7 Sq.mtr Code 0 to go with the 10 Sq mtr mainsail. I know little about how to rig and control the Code 0. Looking for the simplest solution for single handed sailing.
As a Code Zero on an unstayed mast is a previously unheard of combination (at least to me) perhaps you need to go back to M Montaubin for that advice. It is very difficult to see how you could keep sufficient rigidity in an unstayed mast to hold a Code Zero luff taut.It's a home built Wabi 17 designed by Gilles Montaubin of Chantier Mer in La Rochelle, FR. Both sail designs were supplied by M. Montaubin. I've been sailing under the main alone for 8 years and am now looking for advice as to the rigging and deck hardware needed to control the true Code 0.
All good thoughts. The mast is quite stiff. I assume that the rig tension will not necessarily be high. However, I intend to ask the designer what limits I must impose on myself (and the rig) before setting off in high winds. Cheers.There have been a few boats with jibs and unstayed masts.
Perhaps the Laser Pico is the most numerous.
There have been boats which go well with very low rig tension.
There are a few boats where mainsail leach tension is key to preventing the asy from breaking the mast in a breeze.
All rigs are compromises!
It's an expensive game to experiment with, so I would be asking the rig designer what they had in mind.
If the mast is not pretty stiff, then maybe running backstays could be considered?
More often referred to as a “spinnaker chute” in European terms, particularly when built into the hull.Spinnaker-Sock This explains in detail how to build a sock. I'll be buying the materials this week.
Thank you muchly for your continued interest in my project. I stand corrected, although the article referred to the project as a spinnaker sock. No matter what the term, my long-term goal is to be able to set and retrieve the, yes Code 0, sail from the helm. Gilles Montaubin designed and called the sail that I have a Code 0, so I will continue to use the same term. Unless he advises to the contrary, it will be used for downwind, reaching, and possibly headed upwind in light conditions. Apparently, Gilles doesn't think a taut luff rope is necessary.More often referred to as a “spinnaker chute” in European terms, particularly when built into the hull.
Probably a useful solution IF the sailmaker has fitted one, or preferably two, attachment points in the middle of the sail for a retrieval line.
Sounds like you are looking at a conventional “asymmetric spinnaker” for downwind sailing, rather than a “Code Zero” which is more often used as a reaching sail, with a taut luff rope.
Your description is most welcomed. I'll attempt to post pictures. (Perhaps only one at a time in subsequent responses.) Regards.I had a Freedom 21, which has an unstayed mast, and the spinnaker had a downhaul attached to it's centre which ran back through the sock on deck and was joined onto the halyard. It was possible to douse the sail extremely quickly and impossible to dump it into the water, which made single-handed spinnaker use very easy (combined with the amazing gun-mount pole arrangement).
I saw a picture of the Wabi design some years ago and admired it. Do post pictures if you have them, that would also make it easier to advise on rigging.
Technically it won't be a Code 0 then, but there's more important things in life to worry about than terminology.Thank you muchly for your continued interest in my project. I stand corrected, although the article referred to the project as a spinnaker sock. No matter what the term, my long-term goal is to be able to set and retrieve the, yes Code 0, sail from the helm. Gilles Montaubin designed and called the sail that I have a Code 0, so I will continue to use the same term. Unless he advises to the contrary, it will be used for downwind, reaching, and possibly headed upwind in light conditions. Apparently, Gilles doesn't think a taut luff rope is necessary.
Only if..... If spinnaker fabric then the sock will be fine.
Well yes obviously. Although they can be retrofitted.Only if
1) the sailmaker has fitted patches in the centre of the sail to attach a downhaul; and
2) it doesn't have a very stiff luff torque rope that a code zero typically has to assist furling