ridiculous survey costs

A bit more expensive in Netherlands but probably because of the steel hull. 1350 Euro. Would have been 2500 if we’d opted for the fancier hull thickness scan
 
capnsensible said:
There are many threads complaining about things that people are unable to do themselves..
Click to expand...
I could do a survey but the insurance company requires a "professional". I don't see why they don't just give a digital form which can be populated with info and pics. Would have saved me spending Euro 750 on an idiot.

Another ps: the idiot added a bit in his survey suggesting that I install marelon seacocks. He didn't notice that they already all were.
 
steve yates said:
At the end of the day, it depends if they are thorough & good, A good surveyor at £850 could be value for money, a poor one at £500 an utter waste of cash.
Click to expand...

I agree.

It is not something to get done solely on price. As someone once told me, in relation to something completely different, you have to decide what precisely is it you want, then whether you can afford it, rather than just think what can you (or want to) afford. Otherwise you run a serious risk of getting something that doesn't actually do the job yet have shelled out money and are no further ahead. Then if your budget doesn't provide what you wanted, you are consciously amending your budget or your expectations (if either of those are possibilities), or the intention as a whole. Too much of both goods and services, I feel, is done solely on price these days (and i am on a tighter budget than most on here).

It is a challenge to identify which are the good surveyors (on both skills and service) - word of mouth (the YBW forums are helpful here) is about all we have to separate the wheat from the chaff- and often times one is forced by circumstances to take the luck of the draw.

I am lucky to have had mostly good advice and acceptable service from the surveyors I have used, but I am aware of some being very poor. I have found most useful the ability to review a draft of the survey report, and suggest amendments, not to challenge the surveyor's opinion but to point out factual errors, request clarification of advice, or avoid unnecessarily specific and problematic recommendations (when there were also other, potentially better/simpler/cheaper, remedies available), and instead to identify the problem needing to be resolved, and give any suggested solutions as examples rather than prescriptions (which are then always translated into requirements by insurers).

For example, a boat i was buying had teak slat panels sitting on the on the GRP cockpit seats, held in place simply by gravity and rubber mounting pads for grip. The surveyor was concerned that these could potentially slide out of place when heeled or awkwardly trod on, fair enough, and recommended these were drilled and bolted down to the cockpit benches before the boat was launched. The cockpit benches were balsa cored, so bolting them down was not that simple, and one panel would have had to be redesigned and rebuilt as several as it covered and extended beyond a large lifting cockpit locker lid and a gas locker lid (originally accessed simply by lifting the slatted panel off). In practice, once the recommendation was amended to elimination of the potential slippage hazard, which the surveyor was content to do, we simply took the teak panels off and put them in the loft! (We'd intended to tackle the problem at the end of the first season, I pondered various designs that would hold them laterally in place, but by that time we'd forgotten about the teak slat panels until we moved house, by which time we were very satisfied by the comfort and practicality of the GRP seats, so they went back in the new loft until the boat was sold. We'd also met in the interim an owner of the same model who was faced with gruesome task of replacing the balsa core of his cockpit seats because a previous owner ('or perhaps even those who'd built his yard finished boat) had simply screwed teak slats into the GRP surface of the seats, exposing the balsa core to water ingress.)

I also had something (I can't remember exactly what) which was helpfully suggested by a surveyor as being in the long term durability of the boat, but which was not urgent and would have been time consuming and expensive to do at the distance the boat I was buying was then lying. When pointed out to the surveyor he was happy to move it out of the list of requirements before launching and instead in the final report he recommend it to be done when next lifted, or within a year, or somesuch.

More generally on surveyor quality, in one case when buying I was partly relying on a copy of a survey done just weeks before for another potential purchaser who had pulled out for a seemingly unrelated reason, knowing full well I didn't have the legal 'benefit' of the survey. That surveyor may have known his onions in regard to boat construction for all I could tell, but was incapable of expressing himself clearly in English (or perhaps even thinking clearly), so the report was garbled, vague and of limited practical use: e.g. a part of the electrical system was identified as wrongly installed and needing correction, without saying what he thought was wrong with it or how it should be different. Fortunately I also had the benefit of an excellent thorough, clear and detailed survey report done 10 years earlier on the same boat, with the same questioned arrangement, by a different surveyor (who actually taught surveying and wrote an apparently well regarded textbook on the subject) who had no quibble about the system in question and had actually included a photo of it. (I also had to help me on that purchase decision a very experienced boatbuilder acquaintance who had newly also qualified as a surveyor, who kindly gave the boat an informal quick look over and pronounced I wasn't buying a lemon, but who even in his brief inspection of the fundamentals had picked up a potentially important issue the recent surveyor had completely missed.)
 
The insurers of my 45 year old Fireball require a professional survey this year. I seriously doubt that there are many marine surveyors who will have the slightest clue what they are looking at.
 
I’ve been on the wrong end of a lazy, stupid surveyor. Charged like a wounded rhino and the result was shockingly poor.
I’ve also been on the right end of a good one. Gave me some sensible advice on the hill and didn’t charge a penny.
A bottle was sent.
Only advice I have is to talk to them and to the yard
 
barca nova said:
just been quoted £800 so survey a modern 32 foot sailboat. The survey that I had for my previous similar boat in 2023 was < £500. Seems to me that £800 for half a days work is wildly excessive and I dont see any reason at all for the ;level of increases.

What have you paid recently? Solent / south coast area
Click to expand...
Nick Vass ( Omega ) was £450 for my 34 ft 1979 Long keeled ketch
barca nova said:
just been quoted £800 so survey a modern 32 foot sailboat. The survey that I had for my previous similar boat in 2023 was < £500. Seems to me that £800 for half a days work is wildly excessive and I dont see any reason at all for the ;level of increases.

What have you paid recently? Solent / south coast area
Click to expand...
try Nick Vass Omega Yacht Services ( central Solent) very experienced surveyor was £450 last week for my 1979 long keeled ketch.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Top