Momac
Well-Known Member
Wifi is perhaps too new fangled for some in the sailing community.
Some of us work in the tech industry. Experience and qualifications are why I don't trust WiFi with anything important.Wifi is perhaps too new fangled for some in the sailing community.
Wifi is perhaps too new fangled for some in the sailing community.
If you don't use radar in good weather how do you learn how to use/interpret correctly? I use mine all the time on a dedicated screen, when the fog comes down I've got a pretty good idea what I'm looking at.I also agree you don't need radar in good weather
I did say ''perhaps''
I agree Raymarine cables are ridiculously over priced.
I also agree you don't need radar in good weather
Yes, but the AIS antenna is higher up, gives a better range and gives more information.Radar, or some radar will see beyond your visual horizon. A large commercial vessel heading toward you might be with you in 1 hour - taking avoiding action early - taking that tack you need to take, now, rather than later might lead to a more relaxed passage
I do agree about using it in good weather but modern radar overlaid on an MFD doesn’t need learning like standalone used to. I went over my course notes and almost none of it is relevant on my new set, it’s all just obvious, especially with AIS overlaid too!If you don't use radar in good weather how do you learn how to use/interpret correctly
the issue with WiFi is the band it uses usually. Transmitting with higher power almost never helps unless you need distance, which you don’t in this instance. It’s extremely susceptible to interference in the microwave range which includes some radar. It doesn’t penetrate water at all (therefore also not people, rain, wet decks), and without MIMO it isn’t happy with reflections from things like decks. It does work, of course it does. It doesn’t work as reliably as cable though and has a great many failure modes in a marine environment. I agree the thick cables are a bit of a pain to run, but an hour of fitting pain in exchange for some certainty seems a good trade off. We’ve all seen how reliable WiFi is this year on Xoom and Teams calls while working from home!Just thinking aloud here but I’m wondering if the wireless unreliability reported by Paul and others is caused by the comparatively low(?) output power of a battery powered mast top device designed to eek its power out.
Yes, but the AIS antenna is higher up, gives a better range and gives more information.
Yes it is worth running the radar occasionally in good visibility for practice, but our AIS (and chart plotter) is on at all times but the radar very rarely.
Very valuable in the rare occasions used, however.
If you don't use radar in good weather how do you learn how to use/interpret correctly? I use mine all the time on a dedicated screen, when the fog comes down I've got a pretty good idea what I'm looking at.
Answering your question from my experience - never had a WiFi connection issue other than when I use my on board myfi to update the system software. It does require the password re entering but once it's done it's been faultless.Thanks for the replies.
Perhaps I should rephrase the question: “ Has any user of the Raymarine wireless radar been let down by the equipment? Are there any stories of actual failure rather than suggestions of routes towards potential failure?”
This wireless equipment has now been in use for a number of years. There must be some record of its performance, good or bad
Thanks again.
We have the Quantum 2 Doppler radar and chose to connect it via cables, as sod's law dictates that when you really really really need it, the WIFI connection will fail.
The data cable connection is not like the older radar cables, it is more like a CAT5 network cable and so easier to run.
DTD