You can stop but you have to anchor, not tie up to the buoys - there was some debate as to whether the temporary buoys were in fact mooring buoys.
I think the other issue was the abuse folk got when they got too close to the buoys or went inside the line of buoys, as far as I have read this abuse was stopped and put down to an over zealous member of staff from English heritage who manned the beach with a megaphone... If these buoys are now permanent I would hope the position in respect of freedom to anchor in Osborne bay has not / will not change.
I'm lost - what function do these buoys actually fulfill then if you can't moor to them, and you can anchor inside of them anyway??????![]()
Well you can anchor inside the area and wind up over-officious berks, seems like a good way to while away an afternoon...![]()
They demarcate a "safe bathing area" allegedly.
But what's to stop anyone tying up to them for a picnic anyway? Will English Heritage have a boatman standing by to cast you off? Somehow I suspect not.
Why on earth would you tie up to an official lit marker bouy?They demarcate a "safe bathing area" allegedly.
But what's to stop anyone tying up to them for a picnic anyway? Will English Heritage have a boatman standing by to cast you off? Somehow I suspect not.
Who is actually paying for this waste on money?
Surely no one will swim again till April so we can just use that space for anchoring?
You could, but other parts of the bay can be more sheltered, give better holding, haven't got a rocky outcrop and don't dry at low water. That's why people haven't used that part of the bay for anchoring much in the past. Generally the only ones that do now are only trying to make some sort of point. Seems a bit silly to all bunch up in one corner when there is the whole of the rest of the bay which most people use through choice anyway.