Lakesailor
Well-Known Member
Why are they using a 100 year old design? It looks awful, like a home built plywood boat.
Is there some special reason?
Is there some special reason?
Why are they using a 100 year old design? It looks awful, like a home built plywood boat.
Is there some special reason?
Can anyone comment on the technique of the crew standing on the foredeck when going downwind.
To me, it looks as if they are rocking the boat, surely an infringement of rule 42?
So what keelboat will replace it?
Can anyone comment on the technique of the crew standing on the foredeck when going downwind.
To me, it looks as if they are rocking the boat, surely an infringement of rule 42?
Not sure the 505 was ever an Olympic boat, but it ought to have been!Nothing to do with what it looks like its a natural progression.
Soling, Flying Dutchman, 505 and even Tornado are all more elegant but now defunct Olympic classes.![]()
The 2.4 m will still be sailed in the paralympics, but they need a keelboat class, why not J24? old design but accessible and cheap. Asymetric would be more fun but many are too expensive for the less well off countries.
I'm with Lakesailor on this, I've only ever seen a Star once, and thought some joker had put a rig on a coffin, awful looking thing !
I do agree there ought to be a keelboat of some kind; as the dinghies include asymmetric jobs, I know it'll never happen but I'd go retro with Flying Fifteens or even Swallows !
Reason (my understanding) for abandoning keel boat classes is that purchase, ownership and campaigning costs are relatively high compared with dinghies, and thus it restricts the number of nations that can compete in them.
Seems Fairy Nuff to me.
On that basis they should drop show jumping before they even look at any sailing class. 2 million euro for a horse!!
The 2.4 m will still be sailed in the paralympics, but they need a keelboat class, why not J24? old design but accessible and cheap. Asymetric would be more fun but many are too expensive for the less well off countries.