FullCircle
Well-Known Member
You ain't getting out of Woodrolfe creek on a moonless night with cloud cover without a torch. The channel buoys, such as they are, are tiny. The mooring buoy markers are a contest to see who can have the smallest one with the least surface area showing, carefully camouflaged in weed, or dulled in black tar of some sort.To my knowledge, which I grant isn't by any means comprehensive, both the Brankfleet and the Yokesfleet have been acknowledged as anchorages since before the dawn of time. I can see that the presence of the buoys could be argued to reinforce that against future encroachment but to me it's the thin end of the wedge of excessive "signposting" (something that over my time on the canals became an ever increasing blight on the landscape)
I suspect the fisherman was just an 'arris and that the buoy will make no difference at all to his behaviour - encountering yachts and mobos anchored in the Yokesfleet would be the norm and any local fisherman would know that full well (and I must say that the local small fishing boats that have passed us at anchor there have always been no problem at all)
Just checked on the chart and, as I thought, according to the Admiralty Quay Reach starts upstream of the quay on Foulness Island. The first stretch of the Roach from the Branklet to the quay is the Brankfleet which is what I've always known it as (it's a very unimportant piece of pedantry I will freely admit but then I'm an old pedant at heart)
I never, or I should say hardly ever, use a torch underway in the dark by the way. It restricts your vision to the beam of the torch. On all but the very darkest nights the unaided eye, if given a chance to adapt to the low light conditions, will see further without the aid of artificial lighting (unless you have a specific medical night vision problem of course). I'd argue that rather than needing a brighter torch, what you need is no torch at all![]()