bedouin
Well-Known Member
IPC haven't really cottoned on to this yet. The future is probably much more varied delivery of content, paper and electronic, with a lot more immediate interactivity with the audience.
The problem is making it work financially; at present people are very unwilling to pay for electronic content. That means that the cost of content provision has to be recouped through ad revenue. Paradoxically that makes the content provider more, rather than less, dependent on advertisers and therefore requires them to take a more popularist approach.
We can already see this in the way television has changed over the last 10 years, IMHO it has been dumbed down and reduced to a series of cheap-to-make high-appeal rubbish like (.... insert any random quiz/talent/"reality" tv prog here).
While these forums are all well and good in the current form the do not really replace the mags because (a) there is insufficient news and product reviews and (b) there is no form of quality or editorial control.
The problem is making it work financially; at present people are very unwilling to pay for electronic content. That means that the cost of content provision has to be recouped through ad revenue. Paradoxically that makes the content provider more, rather than less, dependent on advertisers and therefore requires them to take a more popularist approach.
We can already see this in the way television has changed over the last 10 years, IMHO it has been dumbed down and reduced to a series of cheap-to-make high-appeal rubbish like (.... insert any random quiz/talent/"reality" tv prog here).
While these forums are all well and good in the current form the do not really replace the mags because (a) there is insufficient news and product reviews and (b) there is no form of quality or editorial control.