Tradewinds
Well-Known Member
Only 8 minutes of your time . . .
To a lot of people, setting out to sea in an itty bitty little boat is an unnecessary risk. Everyone has a different risk appetite I guess, and a different definition of necessary. If your username is a reflection of a past or present occupation I should imagine that at least in some respects yours is much higher than mine, and yet I have on occasion set out in thick fog, wrapped in the false security blanket of my little cocoon of electronics.In my opinion, you don't set out to sea in thick fog. Being caught by it when out is one thing, but setting off KNOWING that visibility is bad seems an unnecessary risk.
Lovely.Only 8 minutes of your time . . .
Well, I started to sail long before electronic charting and GPS were available; radar was also only to be found on ships and/or millionaire's boats. So my perception of the risk may differ from yours. I have navigated in fog pre-GPS, but it was a nervous occupation as I knew the errors were such that I couldn't be certain of missing known dangers.To a lot of people, setting out to sea in an itty bitty little boat is an unnecessary risk. Everyone has a different risk appetite I guess, and a different definition of necessary. If your username is a reflection of a past or present occupation I should imagine that at least in some respects yours is much higher than mine, and yet I have on occasion set out in thick fog, wrapped in the false security blanket of my little cocoon of electronics.
DSC02694 by Roger Gaspar, on FlickrI have set out, with radar, when there was a possibility of poor visibility, but in conditions of my choosing. The Waddensee has its hazards but he was using channels with a minimum of a couple of metres south of Harlingen and well buoyed. I don't see this as unnecessarily challenging, with a plotter to assist. In an extreme case, there is plenty of shallow water to go into if you want to anchor for a while but it didn't look as if the few vessels represented that much risk.In my opinion, you don't set out to sea in thick fog. Being caught by it when out is one thing, but setting off KNOWING that visibility is bad seems an unnecessary risk.
To be clear, I entirely agree that if visibility decreases when on passage, you deal with it; been there, done that. But I don't think it's seamanlike to leave harbour in poor visibility.Being prepared for fog should be in every sailor’s repertoire. I don’t mean that they must have radar, AIS or even a plotter, but sooner or later fog will happen and they should be able to cope and have some sort of plan, lifejackets, fog-horn etc, such that fog doesn’t cause actual alarm and failure to think. I liked the fog horn in the film, which looks exactly like our vintage model.
For me, that is too much of a sweeping generalisation. I have several times, not often but occasionally, left harbour with ‘harbour fog’ especially from Normandy and watched the weather clear as soon as we were clear of land, and felt very grateful that we didn’t have to spend another day in port. I can only remember one occasion when I would have certainly invoked your censure, which was when we had a short weather window to set off towards the Baltic but the forecast was a bit vague but included the possibility of poor visibility for a time. As it happened it did go down to about 1/4 mile for a few hours in the middle of nowhere, but we motored on with the radar set at 6 miles and by midnight it cleared fully. It didn’t feel reckless at the time, and even my wife felt quite relaxed about it. Maybe the Dover Strait would be different, but I think you would be at risk of toxic shock if I told you about our first club cruise to Calais in 1978.To be clear, I entirely agree that if visibility decreases when on passage, you deal with it; been there, done that. But I don't think it's seamanlike to leave harbour in poor visibility.
Of course, I'd take local conditions into consideration. I'm well aware that things can change over short distances - I once did geological field work on the foreshore near Dunbar with frost in my beard, but less than a mile inland it was bright sun! And I think I'd have made the same decision as you given a forecast with a possibility of poor visibility. It's actual, present bad visibility that I wouldn't set off in.For me, that is too much of a sweeping generalisation. I have several times, not often but occasionally, left harbour with ‘harbour fog’ especially from Normandy and watched the weather clear as soon as we were clear of land, and felt very grateful that we didn’t have to spend another day in port. I can only remember one occasion when I would have certainly invoked your censure, which was when we had a short weather window to set off towards the Baltic but the forecast was a bit vague but included the possibility of poor visibility for a time. As it happened it did go down to about 1/4 mile for a few hours in the middle of nowhere, but we motored on with the radar set at 6 miles and by midnight it cleared fully. It didn’t feel reckless at the time, and even my wife felt quite relaxed about it. Maybe the Dover Strait would be different, but I think you would be at risk of toxic shock if I told you about our first club cruise to Calais in 1978.