Navtext

Ric

Well-known member
Joined
8 Dec 2003
Messages
1,723
Visit site
This boat, Furuno, as others have recommended. Much better bit of kit, and the display is easier to read. More expensive, but worth it.

Looking at the still photos of the Furuno, the text size seems very large, meaning only a few lines fit onto the screen. Does that not mean a lot of scrolling to read messages? Or can the text size be modified?

I have a NASA Navtex currently, and concur with some of the other reviews on this thread. There is a lot of scrolling involved to read messages - I would want to avoid that on the next Naxtext I buy.
 

tri39

New member
Joined
25 Nov 2008
Messages
772
Location
Sussex
www.sailblogs.com
My Furuno is a huge improvement on the Nasa it replaced.
However if you hunt down the relevant Navtex stations online,
you can then receive them on your smartphone within say ten miles of coast.
I use both.
 

Monique

Active member
Joined
1 Feb 2010
Messages
2,239
Location
Baleares
Visit site
Slight lateral thinking...

Think about a SAT phone with data. Get a friend to upload the weather and email to you. Presto, the wx.

I also have a Furuno NX 300... = good kit.
 

franksingleton

Well-known member
Joined
27 Oct 2002
Messages
3,642
Location
UK when not sailing
weather.mailasail.com
;139788 said:
Anyone have any opinions on Navtext. We will be cruising Norway & Ireland - should we get one or not????

Liz & Laurence
Tidos
Warrior 35


You might like to see my pages on NAVTEX at http://weather.mailasail.com/Franks-Weather/Gmdss-Weather-Forecasts.

For coastal sailing NAVTEX is more of a fallback than an essential tool given marine VHF broadcasts and the Internet. I think that its main value is for NAV warnings. It is easier to read the text and ignore those that you have seen before than listen and take down from VHF warnings many of which will be of no concern to you.

Out at sea, within about 200 miles of the coast, NAVTEX may be your only source of weather information.

My experience with receivers is that there is little to choose in terms of ability to receive. Main differences are in quality of screen and the software. In some ways the NASA PRO that we used to have was better than the Furuno but the Furuno is easier to read. You may find that the newer NASA sets are considerably better than the previous versions.

The national frequency of 490 kHz is slowly gaining ground. It is used by the UK. Ireland (Malin Head) and Germany for Inshore forecasts. Some other countries use it for national language versions of what is on 518 kHz. I would recomend having a dual frequency set.
 
Top