MM5AHO
Well-Known Member
Someone recently asked (in another thread) about reception of Navtex stations.
I thought to test this out, and here's the result.
Using a NASA Target Pro plus v2 receiver and their H Vector antenna, all indoors (probably worse that at sea), and located in central Scotland, I received transmission without garbling or signal loss from the list below.
Given that list, I'd say that Navtex covers a good area, and that transmissions are widely receivable. In fact there's so much information overload that the filtering of messages (programmable) is necessary to avoid that which is of no immediate use.
U Tallin (Estonia)
V Vardo (Norway)
W Valentia (Ireland)
X Grindavik (Iceland)
B Bodo (Norway)
K Niton (UK)
D Torshavn (Faeroes)
Q Malin Head (Ireland)
P Netherlands Coastguard
J Givslovshammar (Norway)
G Cullercoats (UK)
E Niton (UK)
T Oostende (Belgium)
S Pinneberg (Germany)
R Saudenes (Iceland)
I thought to test this out, and here's the result.
Using a NASA Target Pro plus v2 receiver and their H Vector antenna, all indoors (probably worse that at sea), and located in central Scotland, I received transmission without garbling or signal loss from the list below.
Given that list, I'd say that Navtex covers a good area, and that transmissions are widely receivable. In fact there's so much information overload that the filtering of messages (programmable) is necessary to avoid that which is of no immediate use.
U Tallin (Estonia)
V Vardo (Norway)
W Valentia (Ireland)
X Grindavik (Iceland)
B Bodo (Norway)
K Niton (UK)
D Torshavn (Faeroes)
Q Malin Head (Ireland)
P Netherlands Coastguard
J Givslovshammar (Norway)
G Cullercoats (UK)
E Niton (UK)
T Oostende (Belgium)
S Pinneberg (Germany)
R Saudenes (Iceland)