G
Guest
Guest
The only direct comparative experience I have is with CQR versus Bruce. I have a CQR and Bruce which are of the same weight - I use the Bruce as a stern anchor in the Baltic. Before that I used the CQR when I needed a stern anchor. Generally I found that on those conditions (water is typically about 3-5m deep and often with a bit of weed over what I think is mud) the CQR is a nightmare to get it to dig in. Using the Bruce, it nearly always bites straight away, and I then use the cockpit winches on the rode to dig it in as hard as I can. And yes, I've tried setting them both in the same place on the same day! Gave up with the CQR and once I'd attached the Bruce had no problem.
That's not very scientific, I know, and says nothing about their ultimate holding power, but I was amazed at the difference in them 'biting'. Bruce seems to be fairly universal as a stern anchor in the Baltic. And there of course the stern anchor is the 'main' one - it's not uncommon to see a yacht swinging by her stern for the night in the middle of a bay!
That's not very scientific, I know, and says nothing about their ultimate holding power, but I was amazed at the difference in them 'biting'. Bruce seems to be fairly universal as a stern anchor in the Baltic. And there of course the stern anchor is the 'main' one - it's not uncommon to see a yacht swinging by her stern for the night in the middle of a bay!