DFL1010
Active member
Thanks all, that pretty much tallies up with my understanding/expectation of the situation.
Well, I was thinking along the lines that if I were moving someone else's boat without permission, and did some damage, it should really be me that at least offers to pay for it. Likewise I'd expect an offer to pay if it were my boat. Therefore, if it's a big expensive boat, paying that bill would be quite annoying, making me less likely to move the thing (not to mention those with expensive boats tend to be a bit more precious about the thing, not entirely unreasonably).
Has Britain become so litigious that people first think about their insurance and their solicitor before they do anything?
Well, I was thinking along the lines that if I were moving someone else's boat without permission, and did some damage, it should really be me that at least offers to pay for it. Likewise I'd expect an offer to pay if it were my boat. Therefore, if it's a big expensive boat, paying that bill would be quite annoying, making me less likely to move the thing (not to mention those with expensive boats tend to be a bit more precious about the thing, not entirely unreasonably).