Observer
Active member
Time for a new thead on this and I'll add a little factual comment, which John Watson may confirm or not.
1. MDL's latest filed accounts (to 31.12.01) show pre-tax profit of £4.4M. Capital employed is £80Mish (depends exactly how you measure it) so ROCE (return on capital employed) is in the order of 4-5%, which is somewhat on the low side. If I was a shareholder, I'd be looking for 10% minimum.
2. Premier Marina's latest filed accounts to 31.3.02 show £2.4M pre-tax profit on capital employed of £22Mish so their ROCE is more healthy at about 11%.
What does this prove? Not much except (a) MDL's financial performance is not exactly in the stratospheric range (which is why, I believe, John Watson was brought in); and (b) Premier Marinas are doing better but still comfortably within the expected performance range.
Are marina prices a rip-off. Emphatically not. They're taking advantage now of the (for the moment) buoyant consumer market by increasing prices ahead of inflation (but not excessively so). And why shouldn't they? In a year or two, if they're forced to reduce prices because the economy has turned sharply down (which, from my business standpoint, looks increasingly likely), are we, as berth-holders, likely to offer to pay more to help them through hard times?
Let's face it, spending on leisure boating is at the zenith of discretionary spending. If we don't like the prices, or can't afford them, we can and will turn off the tap pretty quickly.
1. MDL's latest filed accounts (to 31.12.01) show pre-tax profit of £4.4M. Capital employed is £80Mish (depends exactly how you measure it) so ROCE (return on capital employed) is in the order of 4-5%, which is somewhat on the low side. If I was a shareholder, I'd be looking for 10% minimum.
2. Premier Marina's latest filed accounts to 31.3.02 show £2.4M pre-tax profit on capital employed of £22Mish so their ROCE is more healthy at about 11%.
What does this prove? Not much except (a) MDL's financial performance is not exactly in the stratospheric range (which is why, I believe, John Watson was brought in); and (b) Premier Marinas are doing better but still comfortably within the expected performance range.
Are marina prices a rip-off. Emphatically not. They're taking advantage now of the (for the moment) buoyant consumer market by increasing prices ahead of inflation (but not excessively so). And why shouldn't they? In a year or two, if they're forced to reduce prices because the economy has turned sharply down (which, from my business standpoint, looks increasingly likely), are we, as berth-holders, likely to offer to pay more to help them through hard times?
Let's face it, spending on leisure boating is at the zenith of discretionary spending. If we don't like the prices, or can't afford them, we can and will turn off the tap pretty quickly.