Lightning follows shipping lanes

Fascinating discussion. The argument is whether the increase is real or just due to greater reporting in shipping lanes. I loved the neologism 'dataporn'.
 
Yet another one using likelihood the other is may. Anyone who has studied statistics knows that correlation does not imply causality. The press is littered with such nonsense articles often medical.
 
Apparently particles in ship exhaust increase the likelihood and intensity of thunderstorms.

Maps showing shipping tracks vs. lightning strikes at this link - https://www.reddit.com/r/dataisbeau...ightning_follows_shipping_lanes_particles_in/



Some interesting (to some!) discussion of how data recorded etc. below the maps.

Fascinating! Thanks for the link.

Here's the paper. - https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/2017GL074982

[FONT=&quot]We find that lightning is nearly twice as frequent directly over two of the world's busiest shipping lanes in the Indian Ocean and the South China Sea. The lightning enhancement maximizes along the same angular paths ships take along these routes and cannot be explained by meteorological factors, such as winds or the temperature structure of the atmosphere. [/FONT]
 
Top