franksingleton
Well-Known Member
All very interesting. I have been “off air” since I started this thread and have been trying to catch up. Mu motivation was the long discussion regarding the missing lady on passage from Mousehole to Bideford. Unless I have missed an update, it appears that she left Falmouth with no idea even of how far it was to Bideford. Apparently her passage planning was non-existent. In that discussion some contributors doubted the legal question. The report of the Liquid Vortex case in the January, 2013 PBO makes the position quite clear.
Fairly obviously, and MCA recognise the fact, passage planning will depend on what you are intending to do, how far you are going and in what conditions. Somebody going the milk run from the Hamble to Cowes or Dartmouth to Salcombe would look mainly at the forecast and tides. Somebody making a passage from Weymouth to Camaret for the first time would, I hope, do rather more. The examples of Liquid Vortex and Seagair are, in all probability, not relevant to the majority of the sensible people who have been taking part in this discussion. The question to my mind is what can or should be done about those who give sailing a bad name? In the case of Liquid Vortex, MCA seems to be taking appropriate action.
Fairly obviously, and MCA recognise the fact, passage planning will depend on what you are intending to do, how far you are going and in what conditions. Somebody going the milk run from the Hamble to Cowes or Dartmouth to Salcombe would look mainly at the forecast and tides. Somebody making a passage from Weymouth to Camaret for the first time would, I hope, do rather more. The examples of Liquid Vortex and Seagair are, in all probability, not relevant to the majority of the sensible people who have been taking part in this discussion. The question to my mind is what can or should be done about those who give sailing a bad name? In the case of Liquid Vortex, MCA seems to be taking appropriate action.