macd
Active member
I agree, more or less. At the moment, 12V lead-acid costs about £1 per Ah while Li-ion costs about £10 per Ah. However, since you can fully discharge Li-ion but shouldn't really make a habit of taking lead-acid below 50%, that's £2 vs £10 per usable Ah. Too much of a difference for me, but when Li-ion is effectively only twice as much - ie when I can buy 100Ah for £400, I'll go for it like a shot.
I expect that point in about five from now. Here's a useful chart from Bloomberg, showing the last few years' prices:
Interesting graphic, thanks, Jumble. I would though, take some issue with your simple Ah cost comparison (the one allowing for relative depth of charge). To my mind it's not very meaningful without a 'life cycles' factor, or some comparable measure. Bloomberg's chart, with it's kWh figure, may be more representative, although its scope is limited.
There's another comparison (clearly highly partial, but nonetheless interesting), near the foot of this page: https://www.powertechsystems.eu/home/tech-corner/lithium-ion-vs-lead-acid-cost-analysis/
Despite the conventional wisdom that lead-acid batteries shouldn't be cycled below 50%, there's another side to that coin, too. Graphs published by Trojan for their T105 show very little difference in gross lifetime Ah, whether routinely discharged to -50% or -90%. I've no way of assessing the accuracy of their claim, but neither have I specific reason to doubt it. (Our T105s very rarely get below -40%.)
Clearly to anyone strapped for cash, up-front cost is paramount, in which case I suspect that lead-acid will rule for many years yet.
Last edited: