Dave_Seager
Well-Known Member
I can think of one reason why a Lavac may be less prone to smells from the flushing water than a Jabsco.
The Jabsco has one side of the pump in the hose between the inlet sea cock and the pan. Even when on the dry setting, only one valve is held open so it will tend to retain water in the pipe from the sea cock to the pump.
The Lavac relies on the vacuum created in the pan by a pump on the outlet side. The inlet pipe is fitted with a small ventilation hole to release the vacuum so that the lid can be opened after flushing. This allows the water to drain back out of the inlet pipe down to the water line. This reduces the volume of water standing in the pipework to become smelly and this contaminated water is less likely to remain in the pan after use.
The Jabsco has one side of the pump in the hose between the inlet sea cock and the pan. Even when on the dry setting, only one valve is held open so it will tend to retain water in the pipe from the sea cock to the pump.
The Lavac relies on the vacuum created in the pan by a pump on the outlet side. The inlet pipe is fitted with a small ventilation hole to release the vacuum so that the lid can be opened after flushing. This allows the water to drain back out of the inlet pipe down to the water line. This reduces the volume of water standing in the pipework to become smelly and this contaminated water is less likely to remain in the pan after use.