Lagoon 42 question

Plenty of monohulls sail to weather here. The sea is 28degC. A bit of warm spray in the face is no hardship. The only ones that join in are Outremer and Gunboat.
We have sailed past Lagoons many times. On one occasion we were hard on the wind from the Saints to Pontre Pitre. There was a Lagoon ahead with full sail. He was pointing high but seem to have huge leeway. It took us a while to catch him. When we got close, he had both engines on! We passed him to weather.
As I said in my previous post. None of my Lagoon friends sing the praises of their sailing performance. Even down wind they are no quicker than a mono of the same size.
You’d stand out round here. Very very few boats sail to windward. We’re a real nuisance, tacking backwards and forwards across the western Solent. Our VMG is about 6kn in 12 kn of wind, meaning most motoring folk going straight into the wind have us repeatedly cross them. I have known them to get fed up giving way.
 
You’d stand out round here. Very very few boats sail to windward. We’re a real nuisance, tacking backwards and forwards across the western Solent. Our VMG is about 6kn in 12 kn of wind, meaning most motoring folk going straight into the wind have us repeatedly cross them. I have known them to get fed up giving way.
We don't tend to spend much time tacking in the Caribbean, but we have often had to do long passages upwind. E.g. BVI to Bequia, which took nearly four days, hard on the wind for every mile. There's no point waiting for a better wind direction when you're in the trade winds!
 
Yes, all very interesting

If I was considering a cat sailing performance would be on my desirable list.

But could the price and availability of Lagoons sway me??
 
Last edited:
Yes, all very interesting

If I was considering a car sailing performance would be on my desirable list.

But could the price and availability of Lagoons sway me??
That surely depends on whether wanting a floating caravan or a sailing boat.
Each have their role. But for me sailing performance is a joy, and without that better just getting a motor yacht instead. But others different.
 
That surely depends on whether wanting a floating caravan or a sailing boat.
Each have their role. But for me sailing performance is a joy, and without that better just getting a motor yacht instead. But others different.
Obviously, we feel the same. Tearing a hole in the ocean at 20kn is why you buy a Dragonfly, though they perform well in all conditions. If we were buying a cat, we wouldn’t compromise on performance. We’d sell the house, buy somewhere smaller and have a high performance dagger board boat, in our case a Dazcat, because they’re great, British, Darren is a great guy, I am from Plymouth originally and my wife is Cornish. Other performance cats are available. Bt it’s a big financial hit compared to a Lagoon. You have to want and need that performance to spend the extra half a million on it🤣 Though in fact the main reason we have not is more practical. We have to fit our boat into Yarmouth harbour, and Scott, the harbour master would have kittens if we turned up in a 40ft x 25ft cat.
 
Yes, I'm happy with my monohull here in these northern climbs.

But if I were to do a Carribean circuit I totally see the advantage of 2 hulls.
 
Yes, I'm happy with my monohull here in these northern climbs.

But if I were to do a Carribean circuit I totally see the advantage of 2 hulls.
No you wouldn't. Most cats get shipped back from the Caribbean. There is nothing better than a catamaran down wind in the trades for comfort, but coming back is totally different. Those that do come back generally have a tough time. The charter cats that do seasons in both Med and Caribbean generally carry huge amounts of fuel and motor most of the way back as they can't point upwind.
The anchorage I am in here has 13 catamarans and 5 monohulls. Pretty typical. Of the 13 monohulls only the Balance and Outremer have daggerboards. Both of those could do the trip back with ease.
Sat at anchor in the Caribbean, a cat wins hands down for space, if that's what floats your boat, but they aren't everybody's cup of tea. Many choose big Discoverys or Oysters as an alternative to a cat and achieve a similar level of comfort at a similar cost.
 
Lagoons have the dubious combination of being vastly overweight (17 tonnes for the 450F) while being lightly built (12mm plywood main bulkhead on the 450). 12mm plywood for a main bulkhead is more suited to a 1.8 tonne Hurley 22.

The way the builder blamed the owners of misuse when the 450's were found to be failing structurally, like "powering against sea and wind for a long time at 30° off the true wind" or drying out, just stinks. I wouldn't care how many have crossed oceans with that attitude.

Italics are Lagoon's words in their pathetic response to blame the owners for their own design inadequacies.
The Lagoon 52 is 26 tonnes, light ship. Anybody that thinks these boats sail well to windward hasnt seen them in the flash.
My boat designer friend calls them condo-cats. It's a pretty accurate description.
I fully understand why people buy them, but if you have a love for sailing, they may not be for you.
A good friend here has a Nautitech 40 open. It looks way more sporty and is better made and lighter than the equivalent Lagoon with a far better aerodynamic shape. Even so, the light wind performance both up wind and down wind is poor compared to our 45 year old heavy displacement monohull. We are no racing boat but he can't get near us in light winds. It would ge a different matter sailing down the trades in 20kts where he would be a little faster and generally more comfortable.
 
I know a guy who is a pro ocean racer and came close to putting together a Vendée campaign. He chose a Nautitech for family cruising from the UK to Australia.

You do get significantly less accommodation than the same size Lagoon.
 
I know a guy who is a pro ocean racer and came close to putting together a Vendée campaign. He chose a Nautitech for family cruising from the UK to Australia.

You do get significantly less accommodation than the same size Lagoon.
Have you been on the Nautitech 40 open? The accommodation in the saloon is limited but the cockpit is incredible. More than twice the size of the lagoon 40 cockpit. The concept for sailing in the tropics is excellent. The cockpit can be fully enclosed even when at sea. The only thing I don't like is the wheels are right out on the aft corners. Super exposed and terrible forward visibility. Not dissimilar to Catanas an some Outremers but they do benefit from better forward visibility.
As you know, you spend so much time outside when in the Caribbean that a boat design that optimises the outdoor space works well
 
No cat without dagger boards can. Outremar are dagger board boats, westernmans comparison is a bit unfair there. Though the guy I know who races his must get it to go to windward surely? I don’t know, because he lives in the Caymans, I have never seen the boat. Perhaps just in flat water. Obviously, better performing multis do go to windward, and the best ones better than any mono, without qualification. So it can be done. But, since most cruising sailors never sail to windward anyway, it’s maybe a moot point. If ypu’re one of the ones that does, then a Lagoon is definitely not for you. Dazcat, Edel cat, Outremar, Gunboat and others all make cruising cats with more sailing credentials.
Sorry but that's an empirically incorrect statement . Many cannot but my own stub keel Prout Quasar will do so happily, comfortably even and quite fast and has done so many times. Ok, there are not a lot of very fine hulled, sub 9 tonne, 50 foot cats but this one (and others) has been around for 40 years and will sail to 35 degrees in big winds and seas and do so fast . I did Dunkirk to Dover in 4 hours port to port at around 40 degrees the whole way and 25-30 knot winds with waves of 2m plus and had a fantastic sail a couple of years ago. Sure a Lagoon of FP will not manage but to say no cat without dagger boards will do so is just wrong
 
The Lagoon 52 is 26 tonnes, light ship. Anybody that thinks these boats sail well to windward hasnt seen them in the flash.
My boat designer friend calls them condo-cats. It's a pretty accurate description.
I fully understand why people buy them, but if you have a love for sailing, they may not be for you.
A good friend here has a Nautitech 40 open. It looks way more sporty and is better made and lighter than the equivalent Lagoon with a far better aerodynamic shape. Even so, the light wind performance both up wind and down wind is poor compared to our 45 year old heavy displacement monohull. We are no racing boat but he can't get near us in light winds. It would ge a different matter sailing down the trades in 20kts where he would be a little faster and generally more comfortable.
A little like for like…. A Lagoon 38 is 10.2 tonnes light ship. A Dazcat 1195 is 4.5 tonnes light ship. A Dragonfly 40 is between 5 and 5.9 tonnes, model dependent. That is why we’d pick the Dazcat. At that size, to us it makes more sense than a folding tri. The Dazcat can carry 3 tons of payload. Enough for us, by some margin, even with full tanks. It’s plain that the Lagoon is built down to a price, and performance is the first to suffer. Maybe the structure is next. But then, they’re half the price of a Dazcat, which is a carbon reinforced dagger board boat. The 1195 is about 7% faster on MOCRA rating than us. And they still win, as regularly as you would expect in a handicap fleet.
 
Sorry but that's an empirically incorrect statement . Many cannot but my own stub keel Prout Quasar will do so happily, comfortably even and quite fast and has done so many times. Ok, there are not a lot of very fine hulled, sub 9 tonne, 50 foot cats but this one (and others) has been around for 40 years and will sail to 35 degrees in big winds and seas and do so fast . I did Dunkirk to Dover in 4 hours port to port at around 40 degrees the whole way and 25-30 knot winds with waves of 2m plus and had a fantastic sail a couple of years ago. Sure a Lagoon of FP will not manage but to say no cat without dagger boards will do so is just wrong
Nobody is still racing a Prout, so it’s hard to disprove you. I find it pretty hard to believe that a stub keel cat with a rig like yours will out point a 7/8ths rigged tri with a carbon mast and sails, a centreboard, and a very streamlined profile. We can’t point to 35 degrees, but we could do Dunkirk to Dover in 4 hours close hauled in reasonable conditions. That is 10 kn average. It’s a big ask. If it was 40 degrees apparent, we’d be off in a cloud of float smoke and over the horizon in 40 minutes of course.
 
Nobody is still racing a Prout, so it’s hard to disprove you. I find it pretty hard to believe that a stub keel cat with a rig like yours will out point a 7/8ths rigged tri with a carbon mast and sails, a centreboard, and a very streamlined profile. We can’t point to 35 degrees, but we could do Dunkirk to Dover in 4 hours close hauled in reasonable conditions. That is 10 kn average. It’s a big ask. If it was 40 degrees apparent, we’d be off in a cloud of float smoke and over the horizon in 40 minutes of course.
To clarify we can sail at 35 degrees - not at 10 knots though - if there is a decent blow we have made 7 knots at 35 degrees though there was maybe a bit of current with us ; not much though. Also, not sure how you racers term things but we only read apparent wind so all my figures are on that which of course will be brought forward of true by our speed but we have no instruments to record true wind (or a log to check current, just what the tide stream charts tell us it should be as a log would weigh more and slow us down :D )

As I said Dunkirk was at 40 degrees most of the time and I think the top speed we saw in the gusts was 14 knots but average was 10.something for 43 miles total distance. I guess I should also say when I rebuilt her I got her down to around 8000kg (less now as I did more lightening of everything this year ) which helps . I would expect on the same day a Dragonfly would be 30% faster though I did arrive dry and reasonably warm . Certainly there were other cats in that era with stub keels (and even the strange asymmetrical hulls on some) that could point well and make headway but they were few and far between I will grant you. Most people forget that amongst the vast range of sturdy caravans Prout built the Ocean Ranger 45 and the original Quasar ( the later Espace version gained 3000kg and was a dog) which were , for cruising cats , very quick and sailable .
 
To clarify we can sail at 35 degrees - not at 10 knots though - if there is a decent blow we have made 7 knots at 35 degrees though there was maybe a bit of current with us ; not much though. Also, not sure how you racers term things but we only read apparent wind so all my figures are on that which of course will be brought forward of true by our speed but we have no instruments to record true wind (or a log to check current, just what the tide stream charts tell us it should be as a log would weigh more and slow us down :D )

As I said Dunkirk was at 40 degrees most of the time and I think the top speed we saw in the gusts was 14 knots but average was 10.something for 43 miles total distance. I guess I should also say when I rebuilt her I got her down to around 8000kg (less now as I did more lightening of everything this year ) which helps . I would expect on the same day a Dragonfly would be 30% faster though I did arrive dry and reasonably warm . Certainly there were other cats in that era with stub keels (and even the strange asymmetrical hulls on some) that could point well and make headway but they were few and far between I will grant you. Most people forget that amongst the vast range of sturdy caravans Prout built the Ocean Ranger 45 and the original Quasar ( the later Espace version gained 3000kg and was a dog) which were , for cruising cats , very quick and sailable .
I have sailed in company with many friends with mini keel catamarans upwind. These are guys who are good sailors.
None of those cats perform as well as a reasonably good deep draft monohull upwind with any sea running. I have watched them as their keels show as they rise over the wave and crash down, hobby horsing and knocking any forward momentum. The leeway is extreme without daggerboards.
Having owned a Prout snowgoose 37 with tall rig, laminate sails and sailed with the absolute minimum onboard, across the pond and back, I am quite familiar with Prout design of that era. Our Snowgoose could out perform any Lagoon of a similar size in speed and pointing ability but it was still no match for a good monohull.
Our Snowgoose weighed 5.3T. About 200kg lighter than standard but that is with much of our cruising gear onboard. Lots of foam core composite used in the fit out instead of ply
 
To clarify we can sail at 35 degrees - not at 10 knots though - if there is a decent blow we have made 7 knots at 35 degrees though there was maybe a bit of current with us ; not much though. Also, not sure how you racers term things but we only read apparent wind so all my figures are on that which of course will be brought forward of true by our speed but we have no instruments to record true wind (or a log to check current, just what the tide stream charts tell us it should be as a log would weigh more and slow us down :D )

As I said Dunkirk was at 40 degrees most of the time and I think the top speed we saw in the gusts was 14 knots but average was 10.something for 43 miles total distance. I guess I should also say when I rebuilt her I got her down to around 8000kg (less now as I did more lightening of everything this year ) which helps . I would expect on the same day a Dragonfly would be 30% faster though I did arrive dry and reasonably warm . Certainly there were other cats in that era with stub keels (and even the strange asymmetrical hulls on some) that could point well and make headway but they were few and far between I will grant you. Most people forget that amongst the vast range of sturdy caravans Prout built the Ocean Ranger 45 and the original Quasar ( the later Espace version gained 3000kg and was a dog) which were , for cruising cats , very quick and sailable .
Ah, clarity. Close hauled, our APPARENT wind angle is 28, plus or minus depending on sea state. At that angle we are 40 off the true wind, and achieving max VMG to windward. At 40 apparent we’ll be on a beam reach flying a Code 0 and doing maybe wind speed plus 10%. Until we furl the code sail and start reefing. About 16kn for the code sail, 18 for the first reef.

Edited to add…. Our wind speeds are ‘true’ as well as direction. 15kn true and 90 degrees will be about 28kn apparent at 40 degrees, with 17 kn of boat speed. Average boat speed that is.
 
Last edited:
I know very little about cats, but I’ve had a go of helming an older Outremer 49 and it seemed like a very quick boat. The interior was spartan but functional. I sailed it upwind and down in some quite choppy seas and it handled well.
 
Ah, clarity. Close hauled, our APPARENT wind angle is 28, plus or minus depending on sea state. At that angle we are 40 off the true wind, and achieving max VMG to windward. At 40 apparent we’ll be on a beam reach flying a Code 0 and doing maybe wind speed plus 10%. Until we furl the code sail and start reefing. About 16kn for the code sail, 18 for the first reef.

Edited to add…. Our wind speeds are ‘true’ as well as direction. 15kn true and 90 degrees will be about 28kn apparent at 40 degrees, with 17 kn of boat speed. Average boat speed that is.
Yep these are impressive boats - I've sailed in a couple and some of the Corsair too - there is no comparison ...

Sadly not built to cruise the world though; at least not in any comfort for any length of time but if I ever want a toy...
 
I have sailed in company with many friends with mini keel catamarans upwind. These are guys who are good sailors.
None of those cats perform as well as a reasonably good deep draft monohull upwind with any sea running. I have watched them as their keels show as they rise over the wave and crash down, hobby horsing and knocking any forward momentum. The leeway is extreme without daggerboards.
Having owned a Prout snowgoose 37 with tall rig, laminate sails and sailed with the absolute minimum onboard, across the pond and back, I am quite familiar with Prout design of that era. Our Snowgoose could out perform any Lagoon of a similar size in speed and pointing ability but it was still no match for a good monohull.
Our Snowgoose weighed 5.3T. About 200kg lighter than standard but that is with much of our cruising gear onboard. Lots of foam core composite used in the fit out instead of ply
I can't argue as I've only sailed in one mono ever - a 40 or 42 foot Beneteau and it was quite quick and very tippy - I don't get why people would want to live on the lean for hours or days on end in so little space but I fully understand your reasons for changing to one in your situation. Would your lottery win boat be a Kraken mono or an Outremer cat (or Dazcat or ORC etc) though?

There are many slow and heavy cats and the Prouts typify that, the SG37 included (albeit the best of the smaller ones) - the Ocean Ranger 45 was built to do one thing however and that was win the Ostar transat, which it did first time out. The Quasar 50 was built from those hulls and extended so it has very fine, long hulls, and sails completely differently from the rest of the Prout range. Right now the only thing I may swap it for is a Dazcat ( for more clarity I would not compare the two - the Dazcat as we all know, is a much superior sailing machine )
 

Other threads that may be of interest

Top