Aeolus
Well-Known Member
Ignore feature!
What a marvellous feature - thanks, Conachair for pointing it out.
What a marvellous feature - thanks, Conachair for pointing it out.
What a marvellous feature - thanks, Conachair for pointing it out.
How do you activate it?
Thanks, it works! And yes life does get better, like the silence after swatting the mosquito. Now where were we? Oh yes, JSD drogues, and some practical details.Click on "user CP" then about half way down on the right side is "edit ignore list", click that then put VO5 into the box and click OK.
Life gets better after![]()
anyone tried this bunch? http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/SERIES-DROGUE...UK_Sporting_Goods_Sailing&hash=item588717d1e0
I emailed them last year about how quick they could deliver but got no reply.
I source those same yellow ones for fitting to my customers drogue rigs made up with doublebraid nylon 1/2" and 5/8". Yes the cone material is light but it is ripstop nylon which has enough strength as long as the cones are stitched well in manufacture.The material in the picture looks like very thin stuff. If you look at the sailcloth provided by Sailrite, it looks to be twice the weight. IMHO, this is not a great area for cost reduction.
............ my concern about the 'poo-poo'ing' of the deep and relevant experience of some very experienced contributors to this.
I've had reason to read through a post #3 - 'Ushuaia to Rescue' linked here, ....... That told me rather more than all on this thread. ........
![]()
I'm deeply interested in the capacity to 'put on the handbrake' when faced with an ocean storm. Over the years I've studied the experience of others via Adlard Coles' 'Heavy Weather Sailing' ( several editions ) and, for catamarans, I've been persuaded that a robust parachute sea anchor was the thing.
So I made one, considerably stronger than what was locally/SIBS available.
For example, I use a 29' military 'heavy load drop chute'. I reinforced each and every panel seam with 1500lb webbing, looped right across the apex. A panel might possibly blow, but the structure would remain intact. My calculations are that the total static weight of the boat could be supported by just one fabric panel.
The rode is 800 feet of 18mm braid, doubled. There is a lifting shackle between the 'chute and the rode, sufficiently heavy to ensure the required sinking, and truly hefty bridle arrangements. All as suggested in the 'Drag Device Database'.
Now, as I no longer have a catamaran to look after, but a traditional heavy-displacement monomaran, I'm putting together a Jordan-type structure.
And while I acquire the bits and pieces for the drogue device, the 'heavy lifting' is in beefong-up the stern cleats to cope. What's there, bluntly, is unfit for marina service. I accept wholly VO5's recommendation for massively-overbuilt cleating facilities in this area.
Further, and much more important than my plans and notions, is concern about the 'poo-poo'ing' of the deep and relevant experience of some very experienced contributors to this. There are several of them, each of whom has been there and done that. It ill behoves those of us who haven't to denigrate any one of them, for we are - in this - just noise in the background.
Where there is controversy, let me recommend we acknowledge its presence and that saving a small boat from a storm is not an exact science.
I've had reason to read through a post #3 - 'Ushuaia to Rescue' linked here, and to consider in slow time what lessons I might learn from what was done and what was 'blogged'. That told me rather more than all on this thread.
Even RKJ was dismasted in the Atlantic, had to fight for survival, and none of us know enough to be entirely catagorical about handling any such situation.
![]()
Agreed there are better sources for considering which type of rig might suit any individual's sailing, and thanks for that one, your details are useful too. Please however remember that this thread was started for the purpose of its title "Jordan series drogue, some practical questions" In other words the details of such a rig and how they can be made/procured. A few members did switch off viewing of posts by a certain member because he added pages and pages condemning the Jordan rig and maligning its devotees without any coherent reasoning. Not poo-pooing his experience, just tired of the rambling and the very patronizing tone. Too late though I fear because the thread has gone quiet, having been largely distracted from its original purpose and usefulness from Page 5 onwards. I'm disappointed that a moderator didn't heed requests and split this into two threads.
When I used the word 'patronizing' a few minutes ago, here he goes again, I rest my case. Could someone please ask VO5 to stay off this thread, as its title says it is to discuss the details of the Jordan drogue rig by those who have already researched it and have decided it is for them. Moderator assistance please........ why some people persist in clinging to ideas that prevent them from progressing in their thinking is a riddle that constantly serves to perplex me deeply. ..........
'Attsitt !![]()
I have no more to say on the subject. That's it.