J'Accuse..........

photodog

Lord High Commander of Upper Broughton and Gunthor
Joined
8 Apr 2007
Messages
38,378
Visit site
J\'Accuse..........

Sir,

Would you allow me, grateful as I am for the kind reception you once extended to me, to show my concern about maintaining your well-deserved prestige and to point out that your star which, until now, has shone so brightly, risks being dimmed by the most shameful and indelible of stains?

Unscathed by vile slander, you have won the hearts of all. You are radiant in the patriotic glory of our country.

But what filth this wretched Raggie Rant affair has cast on your name.

As they have dared, so shall I dare. Dare to tell the truth, for I have pledged to tell the full and complete truth if the normal channels of justice failed to do so. My duty is to speak out; I do not wish to be complicit. My nights would otherwise be haunted by the spectre of the innocent sailor, far away, suffering the most horrible of tortures for a crime he did not commit.

And it is to you, Sir, that I shall proclaim this truth, with all the force born of the revulsion of an honest man. Knowing your integrity, I am convinced that you are unaware of the truth.

First of all, the truth about Raggies trial and conviction:

The ringleader behind it all is one evil man, Lt Colonel Catastrophe, who was at that point just a Major. He is the entire Raggie case, and will not all come to light until an honest enquiry firmly establishes his actions and responsibilities. He appears to be the shadiest and most complex of figures, spinning outlandish intrigues, indulging in the sort of thing one sees in cheap thriller novels: stolen documents, anonymous letters, meetings in deserted locations, mysterious women scuttling around at night, peddling damning evidence.

He was the one who came up with the scheme of dictating "I read most of the anti stinkie posts on here, mostly made by holier than thou hypocrites" he was the one who dreamt up the idea of studying the raggie with his magical photographic instrument. And he was the one that virtually admits he ignores Rule 26 by passing off a weak joke. I need not say all: seek more and ye shall find. I am simply stating that Major Catastrophe, as the officer of justice charged with the preliminary investigation of the Raggie case, is — chronologically and in terms of responsibility — the prime culprit in the horrid miscarriage of justice that has been committed, and is himself a hypocrite.

I repeat with the most vehement conviction: truth is on the march, and nothing shall stop it. Today is only the beginning for this case, since it is only today that the positions have been made clear: on one side, the guilty parties, who do not want the light to shine forth, on the other, those who seek justice and who will give their lives to see that light shine. I have said it elsewhere and I repeat it now: when truth is buried underground, it builds up and acquires an explosive force that is destined to blast everything away with it. We shall see whether we have set ourselves up for the most resounding of disasters, yet to come.

But this letter is long, Sir, and it is time to conclude it.

I accuse Lt Col Catastrophe of being the diabolical creator of this miscarriage of justice — unwittingly, I would like to believe — and of defending this sorry deed, over the last hour or so, by all manner of ludricrous and evil machinations.

In making these accusations I am aware that I am making myself liable to the evil Machinations of the North Wales Posse. I expose myself to that risk voluntarily.

As for the person I am accusing, I do not know him, I have never seen him, and I bear him neither ill will nor hatred. To me he is a mere entity, agent of harm to society. The action I am taking is no more than a radical measure to hasten the explosion of truth and justice.

I have but one passion: to enlighten those who have been kept in the dark, in the name of humanity which has suffered so much and is entitled to happiness. My fiery protest is simply the cry of my very soul. Let them dare, then, to bring me before a court of law and let the enquiry take place in broad daylight! I am waiting.

With my deepest respect, Sir.

Photodog, 31 August, 2008
 
Re: J\'Accuse..........

quote "In making these accusations I am aware that I am making myself liable to the evil Machination of the North Wales Pose. I expose myself to that risk voluntarily."

The mind boggles as to what the "North Wales Pose" is - has anyone got a picture.
 
Re: J\'Accuse..........

[ QUOTE ]
The mind boggles as to what the "North Wales Pose" is - has anyone got a picture.

[/ QUOTE ]

sheep.jpg



/forums/images/graemlins/laugh.gif
 
Re: J\'Accuse..........

Err that should have been "Posse"

But that picture works as well with either interpetation....
 
Re: J\'Accuse..........

Don't ask Malc. mayhap he intended to say posse?

But I say, PhotoDog, leave the Major alone, poor soul has a Peche Promenade but cannot get the Peche into it in order for them to Promenade.

I myself am a former anti-moBo'er, but have discovered that, even including Haydn, they are a jolly lot when you actually get to meet them. Even LittleShip's attack whippets could only manage to give me a severe licking when I was unsuspectingly dumped in the back of their car for a jolly welcome lift home from the pub.

Now, I am that most heinous of Raggie criminals - a holder of a Royal Warrant for the defaced Blue, so if I can accept that mere MoBos have the right to co-exist with pure-blood Raggies, why can't you, as a mere mongrel image of a Raggie, live & let live?
 
Re: J\'Accuse..........

P8280007.jpg



PROOF!!!! Look, fishing!!!!

See no double inverted baskets as required in rule 26!!!

[ QUOTE ]
Either there are rules or there aren't rules

[/ QUOTE ]


HA HA!!!
 
Re: J\'Accuse..........

My, he sounds like one hell of a guy.

Smoke me a kipper, I'll be back for breakfast, if you can catch one.


PS. The picture you posted is not of me, or my bateaux.
 
Re: J\'Accuse..........

[ QUOTE ]
PS. The picture you posted is not of me, or my bateaux.

[/ QUOTE ]


Ha, that old chestnut......


I can assure you sir, 5 minutes in Photoshop and even your best friend will attest that that is you.......

But, close enough!

/forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif
 
Re: J\'Accuse..........

[ QUOTE ]

The mind boggles as to what the "North Wales Pose" is - has anyone got a picture.

[/ QUOTE ]

Here you go. Just the one small sheep in evidence.

003-2.jpg
 
Re: J\'Accuse..........

/forums/images/graemlins/laugh.gif

So, I guess thats a pretty good get out then..... he doesnt have to follow rule 26, because he never actually catches anything!
 
Re: J\'Accuse..........

i have made three appointments the poster. for interviews.1
as lead writer for:The Hindu: a fine middle of the road publication.
The Statesman not sure what they represent but if you ask them to spell procrastination they say come back next Month.week or year (delete as required). or the express (south India).The Times of India have excelled since 1947 in inglish as he is spoke
Your verbosity is truly outstanding and I have referred it to the english language dept in Delhi,Chennaii,and thiruvanthapuram as an example how educated our household pets are.
I have over the years received more exalted pleas for increments
but not with the same scope.
With all apologies to our Indian friends.regards from cochin
 
Re: J\'Accuse..........

I thank you sir for those fine recommendations... but I must be honest with you and pass credit to Émile Zola, who wrote the original in French in 1898.........

I have mearly cut, paste, and replaced, as per requirments.

/forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif
 
Re: J\'Accuse..........

[ QUOTE ]

PROOF!!!! Look, fishing!!!!

See no double inverted baskets as required in rule 26!!!

Either there are rules or there aren't rules


HA HA!!!

[/ QUOTE ]

Far be it for me to defend one of that brotherhood that emits foul emissions from its back end, but have a look at Rule 3(d).
[ QUOTE ]
The term "vessel engaged in fishing" means any vessel fishing with nets, lines, trawls or other fishing apparatus which restrict manoeuvrability, but does not include a vessel fishing with trolling lines or other fishing apparatus which do not restrict manoeuvrability.

[/ QUOTE ]
I very much doubt that that single rod would have any significant effect on the manoeuvrability of a small power boat, and hence the vessel is not fishing as defined under IRPCS. Not merely is she not required to hoist the double cone, but under Rule 26(e) she contravenes the rule if she does!

Mind you, I can't see an anchor ball?
 
Re: J\'Accuse..........

now you have let me down. the average 10 year old can spell better english even though malayalam is his/ her first language.literacy is 97% for males 72% for females and english 47% for males and 58% for females in kerala.
15 local papers.nearly as good as uk.?
no offence.you can lick my face.and a free bone /forums/images/graemlins/laugh.gif /forums/images/graemlins/laugh.gif merely a passing comment.
regards and a grande mot et emile
 
Top