MapisM
Well-Known Member
You gotta love it also when someone mock a whole Country based on a wrong (or even invented!) translation.I love when I countries decide that some vessels don't count as vessels under the rules. I'm curious what counts as a boat vs a vessel here?
In fact, the "for boats but not for vessels" bit simply doesn't exist, in the original version - and I have no idea of what whoever made that EN translation meant with that.
It does, normally.I would have expected comity to apply, at least until something went wrong.
Now, I can only take prinex word for it, because I'm not familiar with Sanremo specifically.
But what he says the CG does there is totally unheard of regardless of the boat flag, and I even wonder if/how/on which basis they are entitled to do that.
In fact, as per the original table that I linked, the prescribed safety equipment depend on how far offshore the boat is used.
And up to 300m from the coast (a segment whose rationale is mostly meant for rental paddle boats and the likes, but which actually applies to any boat cruising within that limit), nothing at all is mandatory.
And the first aid kit only becomes mandatory when cruising at more than 12Nm from the coast.
There are also other bits BTW, like the EPIRB for instance (only > 50Nm), etc.
So, I struggle to understand what the CG want to see ìn a docked boat, without knowing (let alone be able to demonstrate!) how far offshore she is used?!?
I mean, it's perfectly legal to keep a boat docked 24/7, and use her just as a home.
Expecting to find on such boat a life raft, or an EPIRB, or even just life jackets would be laughable...
Last edited: