Is this a problem??

DERF

Member
Joined
4 May 2004
Messages
684
Location
London & Cape Town
Visit site
I need some guidance from the learned members on here.

Boat lifted this weekend and had the hull "damp" tested.

The reading came out at 17/18 I thought this rather on the high side.

The boat has been in the Med all its life (20 months!!).

I have spoken to two surveyors.. one said not a problem, the other said MUST leave boat out of water for 3 months to dry hull!

Anyone encounter this problem before?

Have I got a problem or is this noting to worry about?



<hr width=100% size=1>
 

longjohnsilver

Well-known member
Joined
30 May 2001
Messages
18,840
Visit site
V unlikely to be a problem on a new F targa. What moisture meter was used and what degree of sensitivity was it set?

I wouldn't be losing any sleep about this.

<hr width=100% size=1>
 

billskip

Well-known member
Joined
6 Sep 2001
Messages
11,092
Visit site
as longjohn says..also did they check direct on the gellcoat or thro antifowl?

<hr width=100% size=1>Bill
 

deborahann

New member
Joined
26 Dec 2003
Messages
2,246
Visit site
Well if it only came out this weekend.........It WOULD BE DAMP.!!.../forums/images/icons/laugh.gif

<hr width=100% size=1>deborah on delft.
Nothing to do with Mucky Farter or hlb in drag
 

DERF

Member
Joined
4 May 2004
Messages
684
Location
London & Cape Town
Visit site
L J Don't know the answer to those. Will find what the sensitivity level was. Not sure I understand the relevance of the type of meter.. can you enlighten me please?

I would assume that the readings were taken from all over the hull, and after scraping off antifoul etc..

Are you saying that the reading is nothing to worry about or that the boat does not need to "dry" out?

<hr width=100% size=1>
 

Lozzer

Member
Joined
9 Jul 2004
Messages
535
Visit site
Never known a boat to sink because of moisture content hull.... But willing to be corrected...

It is good to let them dry out once in a while though, every 2nd year for a few months wont harm it.

<hr width=100% size=1>
 

Doffy

New member
Joined
9 Apr 2002
Messages
319
Location
Suffolk
Visit site
I would test again after three weeks out I would suspect it will be back down to 5 -10 sealine hulls come out wet but dry very quickly.



<hr width=100% size=1>I greet you all R Well
 

longjohnsilver

Well-known member
Joined
30 May 2001
Messages
18,840
Visit site
Well as far as I know they all have different scales, also if reading taken thru still wet antifoul/slime etc it would be high.

The reading on a modern almost new boat should be low and the chances of it having any signs of osmosis would be extremely unlikely.

<hr width=100% size=1>
 

DERF

Member
Joined
4 May 2004
Messages
684
Location
London & Cape Town
Visit site
Ok all seems fairly logical suff!.. Just never sure if one's being fed a "pup" by those suposedly in the know..... you know the story..... they guage the size of your wallet and gullibility by the cube of the boat size!

<hr width=100% size=1>
 

ari

Well-known member
Joined
16 May 2001
Messages
4,038
Location
South coast
Visit site
Fairlines are constructed using Isothalic resins which are very moisture resistant.

I'd be amazed if you had a problem with a 10 year old Fairline, let alone one less than two years old!

Unless the gelcoat has been damaged (which could let moisture through to the matting) then I'd be staggered if you had an issue now, or in 10 years time.

<hr width=100% size=1>
 

capsco

New member
Joined
20 Nov 2001
Messages
1,619
Location
North
Visit site
A better idea would be to compare the underwater sections readings with some taken 6" above the waterline,[ unusual to be wet here] this discounts the meter settings altogether.

<hr width=100% size=1>
 

oldgit

Well-known member
Joined
6 Nov 2001
Messages
28,508
Location
Medway
Visit site
Was always under the impression that the gel coat was nothing more than a make the hull look pretty finish and did not make anything extra waterproof.Also heard that large miltary GRP vessels do not bother with gel coat of any description ?

<hr width=100% size=1>
 

oldgit

Well-known member
Joined
6 Nov 2001
Messages
28,508
Location
Medway
Visit site
A couple of years ago went to look at boat in Chichester with exactly same hull survey result.
The boat was a flybridge Pegasus 35,but this boat had been built over 30 years ago but with no obvious hull problems to date apart from the surveyors comment "Its a bit wet sir!" but should be OK for many years yet.

<hr width=100% size=1>
 

Greg2

Well-known member
Joined
24 Jun 2002
Messages
4,546
Visit site
I am told, by my surveyor, that a moisture reading when the boat has just been lifted out (as in a survey) is a total waste of time - course its wet!!

<hr width=100% size=1>
 

DERF

Member
Joined
4 May 2004
Messages
684
Location
London & Cape Town
Visit site
Ok..

I guess nothing to worry about. The boat will be transported back to UK in November. I'll check the reading after 2 weeks out of water and see.

Thanx to all for all the advice

<hr width=100% size=1>
 

longjohnsilver

Well-known member
Joined
30 May 2001
Messages
18,840
Visit site
Correct on both counts oldgit, it's the gelcoat which causes indirectly osmosis problems. No gel coat = no osmosis.

<hr width=100% size=1>
 
Top