PilotWolf
Well-Known Member
I know it's the US but worth a read.
https://www.westmarine.com/WestAdvisor/Selecting-Marine-Radar
W.
https://www.westmarine.com/WestAdvisor/Selecting-Marine-Radar
W.
Nice thought, but West Marine have restricted access to their website, and people in Europe can no longer view it. It's a shame, as I always found the site useful, and indeed I've bought stuff from West over the years.
I' didn't know that, was any reason given?
What they pick up depends very much, particularly on older sets, on the users skill in operating it. I am not especially skilled with radar, but have used a variety of sets. The modern ones with fancy electronics and overlay on a largish chart plotter are certainly the easiest to use.do radar scanners pick up everything or are they only for picking up shipping
A mentioned I would have thought power consumption was a, or the, critical factor on a small yacht, rather than size of the dome.
Current common domes would not be obtrusive on the mast of a 27' yacht, nor on a pylon on the transom. But most small yachts have finite, and small, power resources (unless its a MoBo) and I'd have focussed exclusively at the power needs - as there is obviously little point in radar - if you cannot power it.
Jonathan
A radome is quite a big thing to have aloft on a small boat, with radomes at around 8kg or more. I would consider having it lower at the stern.
I would consider having it lower at the stern.
That would be ideal as a standalone unit, but if as pvb says it is discontinued that is a great shame as it just works and even picks up pot markers as I have noticed.
You're right in saying that the smaller the antenna, the wider the beam. Unfortunately, there's no way round that - the dimensions of the antenna define the minimum beamwidth; it's a function of the wavelength of the radar. Short wavelengths can use smaller antennae, but of course, manufacturers are constrained by the bands allocated for use by radars.The smallest radome I know of is for the JRC1000, which is 300mm diameter if I remember correctly but had been out of production for years.
I understand that the smaller the antenna the wider the beam, which decreases resolution, but possibly modern solid-state electronics get round that.
Radar marketing seems to make a thing of maximum range, when I would have thought spotting a small object close by was more useful since GPS makes blind navigation simpler
For a small yacht imho I believe that weight up loft is far more important than physical size. The B&G 3G & 4G or Raymarine Quantum series are far lighter than their predecessors, also with the added advantage of using far less power. Has the OP considered of mounting the radar at the stern either on a pole, or on the backstay, where they can fit a larger dome?
If mounted on say a 2 metre pole the random would be about3 metres above sea level so what is the distance to the horizon?
power not a problem as i would use it as previously described and most of the time as we all know around the south coast the type of fog we get (cant remember if its advection or convection )means the donk is usually on when it happens .
Don’t quote me sonAye, ye can nay change the laws of physics (as Scottie would have said) ... there have been some (minor) improvements in signal processing, and in pulse formation, but essentially, larger apperture radars work better.
The problem with radars on small boats is not just finding somewhere for the radome, but powering the thing. Modern electronics have improved that somewhat, but they are still fairly thirsty devices.