JumbleDuck
Well-Known Member
One possible benefit with hybrid propulsion (with electric or hydraulic drive) ...
As above, this does not address the basic problem of storage and range.
It doesn't have to, because he wrote "hybrid", not "electric".
One possible benefit with hybrid propulsion (with electric or hydraulic drive) ...
As above, this does not address the basic problem of storage and range.
One possible benefit with hybrid propulsion (with electric or hydraulic drive), providing the motor attached to the prop is small (light) enough) would be the ability to retract the prop and shaft when not motoring. Either a outboard pivoting in a well (or on the transom) or a vertical lift with a curved "box" under the prop that aligns with the hull when retracted. Efficiency will drop a little, but the removal of the need for a shaft through the hull or a large hole for the sail drive seal has attractions. The well would extend above the waterline in a large enough boat, lowering the probability of failure leading to sinking.
I suspect this is actually of little benefit as the number of singings due to shaft failure (dropping out) or sail drive seal failure appears to be negligible - I have heard of one of each, and the latter was due to a cat grounding.
So just an idea for cold rainy nights.
It doesn't have to, because he wrote "hybrid", not "electric".
Ah, sorry..
Nae problem. On the whole I tend to agree that all-electric propulsion is likely to stay niche, though I expect cheaper versions of Torqeedos to eat internal combustion alive for the dinghy market.
However, as with cars, I think hybrids could do quite well. Most of us need auxiliaries for three things:
(1) short trips into and out of harbour - ideal for electric
(2) long plods on calm days - ideal for a small diesel
(3) medium term blatts to out of something nasty or round a headland - ideal for electric+diesel together
Current small marine diesel technology is out-of-date and dirty. When it gets outlawed, as will happen, the combination of small, clean modern diesels with modern batteries will be am attractive alternative to lugging a ruddy great engine around, just in case. The old-timers will stick to what they know, of course, but they can't stop the market moving on.
I happened to be holding First Mates hand at the dentist earlier today and happened to pick up a copy of " Waterways World " the canal boating magazine.
An ad for hybrid drive gave one useful feature not mentioned here, the ability of the generator to provide 8KW's of 240v electricity for lighting, heating, cooking and pumps as well as providing high rate charge, if required, for the propulsion battery bank.
I installed an 8KW Westerbeke genset on Jarrow Lily last year. The power is from a 3 cylinder 900cc Mitsubishi diesel. Very efficient, but in my installation at present, quite noisy. Dealing with that soon.
I can see it being good for inland waterway use, but far more refinement required for use in yachts.
That is a good summary of the requirements of many weekend sailors. However getting from there to a functioning product that meets those requirements is an enormous leap and there is nothing on the development horizon that will make it possible.
As I have said many times just about all of small marine engine requirements are met as spin offs from industrial engines and while the current engines may be less environmentally friendly as they could be, hybrids are unlikely to be the future as most industrial applications do not have that slow/high speed mix.
One can see a place for an integrated petrol (or even diesel) electric hybrid the size of existing diesels but it would be a brave manufacturer to invest in such a beast for the tiny marine market.
But what advantage would be gained by introducing the cost, weight, complication and conversion inefficiencies of an electric motor/generator and batteries into the drive train?
People are only motivated by their own personal interests and there is little demand for electric power through choice as it fails to satisfy wants which are what motivates peoples' purchase decisions.
[...]
If we were denied IC engines yachting as we have come to know it over the last 60 years will cease to exist as it is so dependent on diesel power. Typically a cruising yacht spends as much as half of the time on passage under engine, and it is engines that have made such boats viable for everyday leisure use.
Most of us need auxiliaries for three things:
(1) short trips into and out of harbour - ideal for electric
(2) long plods on calm days - ideal for a small diesel
(3) medium term blatts to out of something nasty or round a headland - ideal for electric+diesel together
The additional cost of an electric motor (or motor-generator, saving you the alternator cost) will be relatively low and give you a nice, quiet alternative to diesel and twice your installed power for a few hours if you really need it. What's not to like?
Let's face it, lots of people thought it was the end of everything when Dylan went electric...
Ok, you've persuaded me! I'm thinking of ripping out my Beta 25 and replace it with a Beta 14 plus a 10hp electric motor/generator together with a few £K's worth of batteries. Not quite the suggested 50/50 power split, but near enough and I've saved every bit of 20kg on the diesel weight to set against all the electrical gear.
My "all-day" motoring speed might still be ~6kts, albeit at WOT rather than a comfortable 75% max revs, and never mind the change from a smooth 3 cyl. engine to a less smooth 2 cyl. job. Just imagine how quiet and smooth my manoeuvering in the marina will be!
A problem now arises! How big should the prop. be? Matched to the 14hp/ 3600 rpm of the diesel or for the 24 hp of the total system power?
But you're selling the hybrid system as allowing a small engine enabling "long plods on calm days". What you will finish up with is a not-so-small engine working its inefficient socks off to match its bigger brother. I really can't see the benefit given current or near future state of play. And I may not want a Brunton prop! Or an electrical system that I use once in a blue moon. Why not the slightly larger engine in the first place. I can fully replenish its energy storage in about 10 minutes as well..
Is your current prop matched to the ~15hp you'll use when cruising or fr the ~30hp you have available? It's the same problem, and if your answer isn't "Brunton Autoprop" it's probably wrong.
Which of course makes them less suited for marine use and ideally suited for hybrids in which the prime mover can operate at maximum efficiency whenever its running. That's why Calmac are going hybrid - it's a larger scale, but the principles are just the same.
I agree, up to a point. The marine market is small-ish, but it bears a high premium. And remember, the hybrid package is going to be a 15hp diesel plus electrics replacing a 30hp diesel. We'll all have 'em, one day.
Vicarage;6639620 the generator would be quieter and more eco than a propulsion engine.[/QUOTE said:Why would that be, given the conversion inefficiencies of the electric drives?
We can then have two generators sited dead amidships in the deep bit of the bilge, with no shaft run issues, and with 100% redundancy.