stuartwineberg
Well-Known Member
But unfortunately in the case of Beaulieu river, Edward does!
Indeed and as we know he polices it very vigorously, although the young lady harbourmaster who nobbled us was charming
But unfortunately in the case of Beaulieu river, Edward does!
Are there no discrimination laws there? It wouldn't be allowed in France.
Unfortunately it's the annual cost of maintaining the boat which drastically limits my funds when I get cruising.There is always an exception to every rule, isn't there? Good on you. My old Sigma 33 was the same over nearly ten years of ownership.
Maybe I should have been more complicated and added in the average annual cost of maintaining your yacht as well.......I stick to my point that £20 for a weekend mooring is small beer in relation to most of the other costs involved in getting on the water.
But unfortunately in the case of Beaulieu river, Edward does!
Quote "Beaulieu River is part of the Beaulieu Estate and is one of the few privately owned rivers in the world."
98% of all rivers and consequently the riverbeds in England are in private ownership and belong to the landowners of the adjoining land. In the River dart a part of the mooring fee includes 'River Tax'
I'm only the messenger!
Would the "nice" representative of Monty's marine force (as mentioned above) have been your daughter by any chance, David?
PS. I have yet to pay for a mooring buoy on the Beaulieu river so I find it excellent value.![]()
Sorry Martin no, it's her husband who's the estates conservation officer, nothing to do with the HM office/river, other than keeping checks on wild life on and near the river, seagull island etc.
20 quid for the river pontoon is quite reasonable, arguably 20 quid for a buoy in that same area is not exorbitant as you are able to access the shore side facilities easily. But in the same way as there should rightly be an escalator for the size of the boat, so too should there be a similar system in place to account for the distance from those facilities and we were a good 15 -20mins from them by tender. After all, £20 is what I would have been charged in Yarmouth with a selection of pubs, shops and all the entertainment of visiting charter boats.
It is the greed of Beaulieu I find objectionable. I remember many years ago visiting with guests aboard our Sadler 26, we needed a marina berth and were told the only one available was rafted outside a French boat, OK, fair enough. We then learned two things, firstly the French boat was to leave at 4 AM the following morning, and what really annoyed me, we were quoted what seemed like an exorbitant rate for the berth, which when I questioned it was told, "yes, thats the rate for a 36ft boat, because you are taking the space where we could put a 36ftr". By now we had all showered and were starting to settle down for the evening, but no way was I going to stay paying that. Bloody robbing b*****ards!
[snip] but re the charges in the marina I thought there was a set fee irrespective of boat length ?
Probably spiffing for a 36 footer but eye watering for a 22 !
No. As with most marinas in the UK, the fee varies with length. See http://www.beaulieuriver.co.uk/visiting
I'm surprised that Galadriel was presented with an argument that payment was based on length of pontoon, rather than boat length, but he does say that was "many years ago". I would hope they have dropped that sharp practice.
Although it doesn't specifically say so on the list of charges that the fee is charged on the boat length rather than on the size of the pontoon, that is what I would assume. If you take a print out of tariff with you, and they try to pull a fast one, I would ask them to show me a pontoon for each of the 14 size brackets in the marina. I strongly suspect they could not do so, and hence it must be referring to the length of the vessel.
I have heard the staff are better now but reports about the Master Builders are still a bit dubious.