mjcoon
Well-known member
Oh dear, metrication won't be complete until all those shop weigh-scales are re-labelled in Newtons! ;-)Nothing can weigh 40kg. The kg is the SI unit of mass. The SI unit of weight is the Newton.
Oh dear, metrication won't be complete until all those shop weigh-scales are re-labelled in Newtons! ;-)Nothing can weigh 40kg. The kg is the SI unit of mass. The SI unit of weight is the Newton.
I see what you are trying say (I think). If you put a flat plate on the seabed, it would weigh the mass of plate x g, reduced by the buoyancy. Then you have the weight of seawater above it pushing down on it. But if the seabed is permiable, there will be water beneath the plate (between the grains of sand) “connected” to the water above the plate thereby pushing up on the under side of plate. The thickness of the plate means the pressure acting beneath the plate is slightly higher than the pressure acting on the top of the plate (density x g x thickness). That difference in pressure is what we call buoyancy.Everywhere there is a balance of forces...a Newtonian thing...so, I stand on the floor and the floor pushes upwards with an equal force..or I would go through the floor or shoot up through the roof...but I still weight something, I still have a gravitational force affecting me and that is my body weight...if I stood on the ocean floor I still have a gravitational attraction to the center of the earth..I still weigh something...and water weights something due to gravity...even if there is an equal and opposite FORCE from the sea bed
Yes...in the real world there are variables...mine was like a perfect environment for experimentation purposes only...perhaps we should have said swimming pool instead of sea.I see what you are trying say (I think). If you put a flat plate on the seabed, it would weigh the mass of plate x g, reduced by the buoyancy. Then you have the weight of seawater above it pushing down on it. But if the seabed is permiable, there will be water beneath the plate (between the grains of sand) “connected” to the water above the plate thereby pushing up on the under side of plate. The thickness of the plate means the pressure acting beneath the plate is slightly higher than the pressure acting on the top of the plate (density x g x thickness). That difference in pressure is what we call buoyancy.
If the seabed is less permiable, say sticky mud, trying to lift the plate will involve trying to lift some of the water above it too because there won’t be so much water pressure beneath the plate. If you go a step further, and put a metal skirt around the plate, put that on the seabed and pump the water out between the plate and seabed, the plate will be pressed down onto the seabed and the skirt will provide a barrier to water permeation and you have a suction anchor which as you say will require you to lift much of the water column above it. But an anchor on the seabed will generate very little suction and therefore only need a force that just exceeds the mass x g - buoyancy force to lift. Mid water, as others have said, you have to rationalise the water pressure acting all over the surface of the anchor
Ok let’s be clear. Mass is the measure of the amount substance within an object and does not change regardless of its place in the universe (notwithstanding the edges of physics where black holes and speeds approaching that of light muddy the waters so to speak)Yes...in the real world there are variables...mine was like a perfect environment for experimentation purposes only...perhaps we should have said swimming pool instead of sea.
The answer everyone seems to want is what is the buoyancy of steel?...which is a known factor and all variables like salinity, temperature and depth are probably also available online... but the question was weight...and weight is the gravitational attraction from the Earth on an object, including anything on that object, so for you and me it would include everything in our pockets, for Charles it would include the weight of his gold hat...and for an anchor the weight of water above it....of course in a real world none of this is possible to ascertain because of all the forces involved...
Note if anchoring near black holes these numbers will not be correct, the holding will be poor and the rate of drift huge. Moreover your new generation anchor will not be suitable and you would need to look to The Next Generation of skyhooks. Ask Neeves for test results