Yes - it's 'up the wooden hill time.![]()
Anybody got a full-size chart, and a tape-measure?
What do you consider 'full-size'?
Since the Yeoman was smaller than a full sized chart and charts were folded to match it, the full sized table was a bit superfluous
A full-size Admiralty chart is A0 in size, i.e. about 1190mm x 840mm or about 47" x 33". However some charts are bigger. We have one which is significantly wider, evidently done to allow a certain area to be shown at a standard scale.
The Leisure Folio charts are A2 in size; one quarter the size of a standard chart.
Leisure Folio charts are 62 x 42.5 cm - that's about half the size of a full-size chart, not quarter size.
The leisure charts are about half the width and half the length of a standard Admiralty chart, so they are one quarter the size. You'd need 4 leisure charts to physically cover one standard chart.
Quite- not fully awake yet
To be fair it is still early.
Enjoy your breakfast.
...working nights this week![]()
Can you point to any source for that assertion?
Personally I much prefer paper charts, so I'm certainly not advocating people sail with plotters only, but I can't see any justification that doing so will of itself lead to legal liability.
Physical objects do not of themselves have a "legal" or "not legal" status. Do you imagine a court will pretend that a plotter on board a yacht did not exist when they consider the facts of a case?
Since there's no specific requirement for a private pleasure yacht to carry any kind of chart at all, the only thing I can think of is that it might be seen as somewhat negligent not to have them in case the plotter failed. But if the plotter did not in fact fail, and so the absence of charts had no effect on the case, is such negligence (if it even exists) of any relevance in determining liability?
Pete