Boat2016
Well-Known Member
Wrong audience here , they mostly like boats with stuff like guardrails .
One step at a time .
You speak for yourself, always nice to see a variety of boats on here.
Wrong audience here , they mostly like boats with stuff like guardrails .
One step at a time .
Just don't dare suggesting such comparison to FB.FB foam filling. Think of the construction as very large Boston Whaler and you get the drift...
Wrong point, I'm afraid - just look at the above pics, and you'll see guardrails in all of them.Wrong audience here , they mostly like boats with stuff like guardrails .
One step at a time .
Wrong point, I'm afraid - just look at the above pics, and you'll see guardrails in all of them.
Along the same lines, my Fountain did have guardrails.
And I am talking of boats whose ballpark speed is almost twice any Itama...
Amati's work was outstanding in many ways, but with all due respect for a memorable compatriot of mine, this blatant concession to form over function wasn't one of them.
Having just watched Aquaholic's test you should be. I think its a fab boat despite the upholstery colour (which I quite like actually). Jfm is right though; it does need some kind of bathing platform or stepped transom to ease access into the water if this is going to be sold as a Med day boat as well as a superyacht tenderWell chaps, I have to say that I am quite proud of it having had a lot of input.
Having just watched Aquaholic's test you should be. I think its a fab boat despite the upholstery colour (which I quite like actually). Jfm is right though; it does need some kind of bathing platform or stepped transom to ease access into the water if this is going to be sold as a Med day boat as well as a superyacht tender
I think it's a fab boat too, don't understand the hate for it.
Water access seems to be addressed by an optional ladder according to the video if it's that much of a problem.
Definitely +1, but that's a typical drawback of O/Bs.
There's an easy fix though: just buy the real thing, which btw is faster even if diesel powered....
![]()
Well, if there's another name for those thingies when they are lower than the usual guard rails, I apologise for my poor vocabulary, but what is it?symbol was a bit of humour aimed at the conservative std FB with grandmas living room and guard rails etc .
Can't see any guard rails btw only hand railing to tie fenders or hang on in the pics ^.
Sorry if this flew at a zillion miles per hour straight over your head . My fault too subtle.
+1.I don't hate it, but just cannot see the point in it.
So, in a nutshell, it's a hull meant either for those who enjoy either driving fast for the sake of it, or testing their own back in wave jumping.
Which is something some megayacht owner might be interested in, I guess.
But fwiw, I agree that as a day boat for someone who owns a Med villa, it doesn't make much sense in any version.
I promise I'm not trying to be argumentative or deliberately obtuse, but I am struggling to understand your logic here.
Driving fast for the sake of it, lots of people enjoy that - everyone with a speedboat or fast RIB for example. You certainly don't need to be a 'megayacht owner' to want that, or have any desire to 'test your own back wave jumping'.
Why would it make no sense as a dayboat for someone who owns a villa, surely it's perfect for that? It's fast, looks a fun drive, has a very capable hull, day space the full length of the boat, sunpads, somewhere for the Seabobs, a seating and dining area, a decent private loo, it's absolutely ideal for that surely?
And although this is new territory for Sunseeker, fast open dayboats are nothing new, from Boston Whalers to stuff like Goldfish RIBs.
As I say, not trying to be argumentative for the sake of it, just genuinely wondering what I'm missing? It's completely out of my league, but if I had need for a fast fun Med dayboat I'd have thought this has real merit.