MoodySabre
Well-Known Member
Promised to take someone there. Time running out.
And if they get it wrong, time will run out even faster!Promised to take someone there. Time running out.
Sorry I cannot check further as I am now on Concerto in Amble, Northumbria.
Now we know you chose to round britain this yearThe masts are supposed to be removed this month. There is no Notice to Mariners covering it yet from Peel Ports, so I assume work has not started yet or close to starting. Sorry I cannot check further as I am now on Concerto in Amble, Northumbria.
Ow we know you chose to round britain this year![]()
This is the link to the first thread and contains a link to the next thread and onwards. Round Britian day 1He's gone where? Is there a link or similar...?
![]()
If they set the ship off while removing them they might have to go find them in the Atlantic somewhere! I don't care what they do with them as long as they don't set the whole bang-shoot off in the process, I'd probably have to go and look for my boat in the Atlantic as well. Reason they're removing them is because the ship is decaying so the masts might be in a similar state.Even once the masts are removed, you might still be able to see them
Kent v Essex in battle over bomb ship masts
I'd be very surprised if they come off in big pieces. They have to be very careful not to create excessive vibration or any big shocks such as might happen if a big lump fell - after all, that's why they're removing them! So I suspect they'll be chopped up into small pieces for safety. I doubt there will be anything worth displaying. Isn't it also the case that the masts are becoming structurally unsound?Even once the masts are removed, you might still be able to see them
Kent v Essex in battle over bomb ship masts
I can't see how a lump of metal falling on deck (falling slowly through water) would cause any more shock than decades of storms plus 1000's of heavy ships going past?I'd be very surprised if they come off in big pieces. They have to be very careful not to create excessive vibration or any big shocks such as might happen if a big lump fell - after all, that's why they're removing them! So I suspect they'll be chopped up into small pieces for safety. I doubt there will be anything worth displaying. Isn't it also the case that the masts are becoming structurally unsound?
Well, the rationale for removing the masts is because they fear that they could fall and trigger an explosion. And a lump of metal doesn't fall that slowly through water; shipwrecks (which have inevitably reached their terminal velocity in deep water) are frequently deeply embedded in the seabed because they hit at a considerable speed - the Titanic, for example, at about 20 knots (10m/sec). Terminal velocity in water is reached in the first few metres, so the depth doesn't greatly matter. Finally, it's shock that could set off an explosion; yes, the other things you mention exert pressure on the hull, but none are shock loads.I can't see how a lump of metal falling on deck (falling slowly through water) would cause any more shock than decades of storms plus 1000's of heavy ships going past?
There's a lot of hype and hysteria flying around. (Not picking on you in particular Antarctic Pilot.)
The bits of mast ought to be chopped up, mounted and sold. I would love a piece of the Monty in a case on the bulkhead, I already have bits of the Cutty Sark and HMS Victory.
They would sell like hot cakes, and the money could go to a charity for seafarers.
Culturally, the ship is part of Kent! Essex has no more claim than Lancashire![]()
A friend shared this on Facebook:View attachment 137270
This is one of the ten holds (five main holds and five between decks) of the Montgomery being loaded with ammunition before she came across the pond.