Hard dodgers

Sybarite

Well-Known Member
Joined
7 Dec 2002
Messages
27,781
Location
France
Visit site
I cannot understand why they are not more popular on cruising boats. Who wants to be cold and wet when there is a simple alternative?

Here is an example of what people say :

SV Hawk (Van de Stadt Samoa 47’) (of this parrish)

“High on our list was a good looking integral hard dodger. We considered this a safety priority as it would reduce fatigue on passage and allow better watch keeping. It also proved to be one of the toughest elements to find and ultimately drove our final design choice. We were not interested in the more popular pilot house/deck saloon concepts as we believe it essential to maintain some contact/exposure with the weather, so we can sniff out early signs of a weather change.

The hard dodger has proven to be one of Hawk's best and most distinctive features. We continue to be surprised the concept is not built into more cruising designs. (Me too)

We used 10mm tempered glass in the dodger, primarily because that's what Oyster uses on their big deck saloon windows and they have never had one break. It has proven flawless and in Australia we replaced the Lexan fixed side windows with the same glass. The Lexan scratched easily and expanded/contracted so much with temperature changes that it would break the caulking seal and start leaking.”


Runnalls 38’

“Of the many innovative and functional design solutions incorporated in this yacht, two elements define the overall layout - the lifting keel and the solid dodger. The lifting keel allows shoal draft capability combined with a high aspect ratio foil and high righting moment bulb combination for good windward performance. The solid dodger provides dry and secure cockpit seating with the mainsheet mounted out of the crew’s way.”


Condesa (Salar 40)

Condesa’s most distinctive, and in my opinion her best feature is her prominent wheelhouse. While perhaps not the most pleasing to the eye, the wheelhouse accomplishes three major functions:

1.It protects the crew from wind, waves, sun, sleet, hail, spray, and the general beating of the elements.
2.It provides relatively dry and convenient place for all of the instruments.
3.It provides a perfect exposed surface for mounting an array of solar panels.

I cannot imagine cruising without it. I guess I would be much more at one with the elements, meaning cold, wet, and having skin cancer. In a recent passage down the coasts of Patagonia and Tierra del Fuego we had rain, sleet, and hail being driven by fifty knot winds. From behind the protection of the wheelhouse it was nothing more than a curiosity; step outside and we were being gunned down by an icy firing squad. Consider strictly the ravages of the sun in the tropics: By having a roof over my head all these years I have saved my skin untold damage.

I have all of the instruments—GPS, depthsounder, radar, and VHF radio—all mounted on the ceiling, hanging down in easy view just in front of the helm. These instruments are all water-resistant, but even the worst of weather can’t get any spray up there. I can also connect a computer for electronic chart navigation, but I usually keep it below. This arrangement allows me to fly by instruments in zero visibility, as everything is right there in easy view of the helm. Boats that have a navigation station down below are putting all the instruments where they are useless to the person who needs them most, the helmsman. I realize this is usually a necessity of the design, but it’s cumbersome in practice. Having someone yell up the companionway what they see on the radar is inferior to seeing the radar oneself.

Many boats have solar panels in precarious places on adjustable mounts. Condesa’s are securely bolted down on top of the wheelhouse where they are always in the sun. I made rounded teak guards for the sharp corners of the panels to protect crewmembers from injury and rigging from getting snagged.
 
Last edited:
No simple answer, but guess that new boat buyers do not value them when there are alternative compromises that are more suited to their requirements. For gentle warm water sailing a large cockpit and a canvas bimini seem to meet requirements and at the other extreme, once you get over 40' a proper deck saloon with inside steering becomes possible while still allowing a reasonable size open cockpit.

Clearly for some people a solid dodger is their chosen solution for what they see as their priorities, but not for everybody.

The people you quote will obviously sing the praises about what they have, for obvious reasons - that is what they chose and it was clearly important to them.
 
Are you talking about dodgers or sprayhoods?

I think our North American cousins use "dodger" to describe what we would call a sprayhood (I don't know what they call cockpit-side canvas spray-dodgers). As I understand it, "dodger" is short for "spray-dodger", and these were originally
a painted canvas screen erected at chest height around the forward side and wing ends of a ship's bridge as a protection against the weather before the days of glass-enclosed bridges.
Oxford Companion to Ships & the Sea, 1976

It would seem that the term could thus be applied to any fabric erection intended to provide shelter from adverse weather, but that "solid dodgers" might better be described as wheel shelters (to distinguish them from enclosed wheel-houses).
 
I think our North American cousins use "dodger" to describe what we would call a sprayhood (I don't know what they call cockpit-side canvas spray-dodgers). As I understand it, "dodger" is short for "spray-dodger", and these were originally Oxford Companion to Ships & the Sea, 1976

It would seem that the term could thus be applied to any fabric erection intended to provide shelter from adverse weather, but that "solid dodgers" might better be described as wheel shelters (to distinguish them from enclosed wheel-houses).

The clue is in the word "hard"...!!
 
Some more for those who might be interested

http://www.voiliersoccasions.com/vo...iers/Bateaux/Photos/Bateau16/album/index.html
http://www.bethandevans.com/hawk.htm
http://www.google.fr/imgres?imgurl=...ur=173&page=1&start=0&ndsp=27&ved=0CCUQrQMwAQ
http://www.runnallsdesign.com/site/Runnalls_Design/38_Cruising_Yacht.html
http://www.bellaluna.biz/2012/06/11/hardtop-makes-a-true-blue-water-cruiser/
http://www.morrisyachts.com/gallery/morris-51/
http://www.breehorn.nl/breehorn-44
http://s3.e-monsite.com/2010/10/06/82990235malo-50-descriptif-pdf.pdf
http://www.google.fr/imgres?imgurl=...ur=903&page=1&start=0&ndsp=27&ved=0CGcQrQMwFA
http://www.yachtsnet.co.uk/archives/halberdier/moody-halberdier.htm


Comment from a Hallberg Rassy 43 hard top owner :

Hardtop provides better shelter in cold environments.

Stress levels are significantly reduced because the Hardtop also gives you an extra barrier against sound from howling winds and breaking seas. As the comfort level is better in rough conditions, we will make fewer mistakes, due to the fact that we are not so exhausted.

We prefer a boat with Hardtop also in tropical places, as it protects from the sun and heat better than a sprayhood. No UV goes thru the hardtop. It is a GRP construction with insulation. With the center window you can regulate the airflow and temperature under the Hardtop.

A bimini will always let some UV and heat thru the fabric. (We also carry a bimini as the hardtop does not cover the helmsman)

You have a better connection for the extension. The combination hardtop and extension gives you an excellent room “upstairs” when in the marina or at anchor in chilly or rainy weather.

You do not have to replace a sprayhood every 3-4 years.

Hardtop provides a good location if you want solar panels.


On a smaller boat you have Kylix, Maurice Griffith's retirement boat where the dodger was high enough to sit under but, standing, you looked over it.

http://www.google.fr/imgres?imgurl=...&sa=X&ei=qQW7VNbsNMruaOqtguAD&ved=0CCUQ9QEwAA

A GRP Kylix: http://www.eventides.org.uk/images3/Ina kylix.JPG
 
Last edited:
Clearly for some people a solid dodger is their chosen solution for what they see as their priorities, but not for everybody.

They've always seemed a huge benefit to me...the unfortunate thing is that while many fine 40 y/o yachts with partially-enclosed helms are still around, there seem to be few new ones so-equipped. I don't believe the benefits of a hard dodger have diminished...but the opportunity to enjoy these benefits must be lessening, as the old boats grow fewer.

I guess modern foul-weather gear encourages new-boat buyers to pursue the streamlined option, rather than the one which permits staying dry while relaxing in shore-clothes...

...personally I'd rather go sailing less uncompromisingly, and retain the option to dodge behind a solid, full-height overhanging screen, in my dinner-jacket. Or jeans. Or both. :rolleyes:

The low-windage superstructure is a winner for performance, but when many designs have been bloated and accessorized beyond aesthetic and performance reasons just to please the captain's other half, it's odd that so few new boats include somewhere for her to sit outdoors, under cover. If the skipper's not a raving racer, he'd often enjoy that option too.

I also think they're a handsome styling addition to any offshore yacht. So I echo the OP's mystification, "I cannot understand why they are not more popular on cruising boats."

DSC_0096(4).JPG
 
Last edited:
I think the Hallberg Rassey/ Malo/Najad alternative of a fixed screen and small canvas top is far more attractive and practical offering good protection without the fugly looking lump and still allows you to drop it on fine days.Instruments are still protected and paper charts are out of the weather for tricky pilotage.
 
Yes also on the moody 41ac which offers this now and seems a major plus in terms of protection. The only downside is I am told the cost of screen panel replacement if the glass screen cracks is fairly high on these screens.
 
This isn't a new thought, but since we must acknowledge that many men will refuse to buy a yacht with a solid dodger on grounds of diminution of windward performance, plus (arguably) loss of looks and the risk of appearing reluctant to go forth and weather every storm in stupidly-manly fashion...

...shouldn't (or couldn't) manufacturers look intelligently at arranging the cockpit within a hefty, removable bolt-on hardtop, in similar style to the 1990s Mercedes SL?

Its fitting and removal might be an early/late-season job for four strong crew, but the result would be a cockpit that's comfortable for ocean-crossing during rotten weather and low-season sailing, whilst its removal in advance of summer would restore the slick lines and pure openness which a permanently-fixed dodger excludes.

It seems odd to split the market between the cheerfully mad "I'm cold, wet and loving it" brigade, and the resignedly sedate comfort-lovers on the other. Wouldn't a combination appeal to many sailors who are neither completely performance obsessed, nor completely unmoved by the slickness of flush-decked styling?
 
That would be my dream

Genuinely, O.V? I can't think why your sentiments (and mine, and I feel sure, the view of many thousands of others) don't guide designers towards such a "unique selling point".

Even if it wasn't sporty enough for some, nor purely-cruiser enough for others, it would surely cover a larger group in between, than most boats currently do.

Let's hope someone in the industry is reading and thinking.
 
Fairly easily acheived. A coaming with through holes for deck lines etc perhaps a couple of inches high and providing a flat base for either a soft dodger or a hardtop could be moulded in place.

Seems like an eminently good idea. I'd bet that 99 out of a hundred would never be removed but the option to do so would keep the initial sales attraction at the boat shows. Slick lines sell at the boat show but we quickly discover that practicality is far more important.

Every time I have been on boats with hard protection over the companionway in the form of a 'windscreen' for the cockpit I have appeciated the protection it offered.
 
That would be my dream

and where would you put it on those rare sunny days when folding the sprayhood is an absolute delight?

I have a full cockpit enclosure of 2 folding sprayhoods & a removable centre panel. With the wind (& rain) astern then the rear hood up is a Godsend. Even when anchored, putting both hoods up creates a calm haven open to the sunshine regardless of the breeze. The rear hood is also handy when left aground after the tide goes out & the wind starts to blow onshore.
 
I think the Hallberg Rassey/ Malo/Najad alternative of a fixed screen and small canvas top is far more attractive and practical offering good protection without the fugly looking lump and still allows you to drop it on fine days.Instruments are still protected and paper charts are out of the weather for tricky pilotage.

+1, and remember the word WINDAGE ! :)
 
the arrangement on my boat (HR Rasmus) is a great compromise as I can stand up and see over as well.
Open the central window to feel the breeze if you want. The helm of aft of the cover so you are exposed to the elements a bit but
we have a full cockpit cover that can be used when sailing if its miserable

I wouldn't go racing with this arrangement but for family cruising it great
 
and where would you put it on those rare sunny days when folding the sprayhood is an absolute delight?

I have a full cockpit enclosure of 2 folding sprayhoods & a removable centre panel. With the wind (& rain) astern then the rear hood up is a Godsend. Even when anchored, putting both hoods up creates a calm haven open to the sunshine regardless of the breeze. The rear hood is also handy when left aground after the tide goes out & the wind starts to blow onshore.

The Nicholson 38 has a hard top roof that lifts off and stows in front of the windscreen.
 
Top