Lets get the ball rolling. What was the respective costs of a Bavaria 42 say 5 years ago and a HR42 5 years ago. What will each one fetch now?
I Know we mostly buy what we can afford but I would like to understand better what are the true ownership costs including loss of income on the cost difference.
Obviously it depends a lot on whether you're buying from new etc. Assuming you're buying secondhand, I think that the Bavaria will probably still work out a bit cheaper despite the fact that it is probably going to depreciate faster.
An even more attractive option financially is to use the money to buy a holiday cottage. The only problem is, it will sail like a brick [--word removed--]-house.
[ QUOTE ]
Are you going to do anything about the lack of siphon breaks to the heads?
[/ QUOTE ]
Bavaria get around this with a nice big sign telling you to close the seacock!
It only needs one on the intake as the outlet is directly into the holding tank. It's on the list, but for now everyone is instructed about the seacocks.
Can you explain some more. What is the difference between Bav heads and others, and what about their sea cocks, don't all boats have sea cocks on their outlets?
[ QUOTE ]
What is the difference between Bav heads and others, and what about their sea cocks, don't all boats have sea cocks on their outlets?
[/ QUOTE ]
Are you are questioning why there is no need to close the outlet seacock to avoid a back siphon risk? If so the answer is that the holding tank is vented and in its position above the seacock and toilet it performs as a giant siphon break.
Should I ever need a broken siphon, for a giant, I'll know where to look.
As an aside, it does seem that AWBs may be improving, in the sailing sense. I wonder whether criticism in places like this has helped improve the breed?
[ QUOTE ]
As an aside, it does seem that AWBs may be improving, in the sailing sense. I wonder whether criticism in places like this has helped improve the breed?
[/ QUOTE ]
Constant feed back from car owners and the desire to maintain market share has seen the average car be transformed from a car that had a sunroof and elec windows as the height of luxury, to what we have today were the most basic car has every conceivable bell and whistle fitted! So yes.
You DO get what you pay for.
The Bav sailed OK, and has some good kit (Volvo engine, decent-ish sails and rig).
The construction of the hull - where I could look at it - seemed OK.
There are a lot of niggles - poor bits of design which really should have been done better.
The general quality of the interior fittings is very much lower than on other yots. Clearly a lot of money saved here. The veneer is particularly ugly.
So, great value for money if you're happy to compromise quality for owning a new boat. That said, there are so many of them on the Solent that I can't help thinking the depreciation will be shocking!
My budget would have bought me a big-ish new Bav. I'm very happy with my slightly older Beneteau, which I believe is a lot more boat for the same money.
sailed a 38 holiday - what a pig - rounds up in the gusts and was really crap to steer down wind (F5) would not like to be opnboard if it was blowing. Great in lite winds - not for me
"So, great value for money if you're happy to compromise quality for owning a new boat"
It may simply be that veneers and other interior fittings are not the major determinants of a quality boat - to everybody. Buy a MAB and get generally, less living/sleeping/cooking space, less speed but more seakindliness and probably deeper bilges ( /forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif) Every choice is a trade off and a lack of decent joinery may not per se make a 'quality' boat
With all these differing views, it would be good to have a selection of forum members, representing different sailing boats, to sail as a crew a selection of Bavarias. For instance, a 34, a 37 and a 42. Both in deep and short keel version.
It would be interesting to listen to the analysis of the exercise.
Come on YM you can arrange it, Opal are buddies of yours!
In my original post I wasn't saying it was better than anything, I was trying to say, "actually they're not that bad at all". They've cut corners sure, but overall I think it's good value for money = to say a Beneteau at less cost. I looked at the Beneteau Cyclades and it looked awful. Liked the Beneteau 423 but it came to 60k more. As to the wood, have a look on a new one, it's fine. I've got 2 kids and paying £100K for a beautiful handmade interior would have ended in divorce. /forums/images/graemlins/smirk.gif
[/ QUOTE ]
This is a subjective call, if the Bav was more than a year old then you were looking at that dark banded veneer style as favoured in the Baltic and evident in LMs and Dehlers.
The high gloss Benny cherry veneer looks superb but at 5 years it begins to break down in patches and then the overall effect is truly spoilt.